Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

08:33
Murine Surgical Model of Topical Elastase Induced Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 24, 2019
7.8K
Ranking NIH Funding of Surgical Departments Based Upon a Modified Index
Sherif S Helmey1, J Bart Rose1, Herbert Chen1
1Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
The Journal of Surgical Research
|November 3, 2021
Summary
The Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) ranking of surgical departments does not require modification. Excluding institutional grants showed minimal impact on departmental research productivity rankings.
Area of Science:
- Medical Research
- Surgical Departments
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding
Background:
- The Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research (BRIMR) ranks surgical departments by NIH funding.
- Current rankings may include institutional grants not reflecting departmental research.
- A modified index was created to exclude these institutional grants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of excluding institutional grants on surgical department NIH funding rankings.
- To determine if a modified BRIMR index provides a more accurate measure of research productivity.
Main Methods:
- Filtered BRIMR data for surgical departments in medical schools.
- Excluded all NIH grants awarded to Cancer Centers or Centers for Research.
- Recalculated rankings based on remaining individual and departmental grants.
Main Results:
- Excluding $42,761,752 in institutional grants caused minor shifts in 33 departments.
- Only four departments moved one quartile; none moved two or more quartiles.
- Institutional grants constituted 10% of total NIH funding for surgical departments.
Conclusions:
- Exclusion of Cancer Center and research center grants had no significant effect on quartile rankings.
- The standard BRIMR ranking is a reliable measure of surgical department research productivity.
- No modification to the BRIMR index is necessary.

