Left bundle branch pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and
Yuda Cheng1, Zhanqi Wang1, Yujun Li1
1Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, YuHua street, Baoding, Hebei, 071000, China.
Insights
Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) shows significant efficacy and safety in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). This novel pacing strategy improves key cardiac metrics and clinical outcomes, offering a promising alternative to traditional CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB).
- A significant non-response rate exists for CRT, necessitating alternative approaches.
- Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a potentially effective CRT strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients diagnosed with LBBB.
- To compare the outcomes of LBBP with baseline and biventricular pacing (BVP).
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI.
- Data on QRS duration, NYHA class, BNP, LVEF, LVEDD, and pacing parameters were extracted.
- Meta-analysis techniques were employed to summarize findings from 6 included studies.
Main Results:
- LBBP demonstrated a high success rate (93.2%) and significantly shortened QRS duration.
- Improvements were observed in echocardiographic parameters (LVEF, LVEDD) and clinical outcomes (NYHA, BNP).
- LBBP showed superior outcomes compared to BVP in several key metrics, with a low complication rate (2.4%).
Conclusions:
- LBBP is an effective and safe pacing strategy for heart failure patients with LBBB.
- Further randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively establish LBBP's superiority over BVP.
Background:
The clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been demonstrated. However, a nonresponse rate of CRT nearly 1/3. Recent studies have reported left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has achieved remarkable effect in CRT. This study aim to explore the efficacy and safety of LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, and CNKI databases for studies about LBBP in heart failure patients with LBBB. QRS duration (QRSd), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), pacing threshold and other related data were extracted and summarized.
Results:
A total of 6 studies were included, and the success rate of LBBP was 93.2%. Compared with baseline, LBBP could shorten QRSd (MD = 61.23, 95% CI: 58.21-64.25, p < .01). Echocardiographic parameters including LVEF and LVEDD significantly improved (both with p < .01). Clinical outcomes including NYHA classification and BNP dramatically reduced (both with p < .01). Compared with biventricular pacing (BVP), LBBP could further improve QRSd, LVEF, LVEDD, and NYHA classification (all with p < .01). However, the pacing threshold at follow-up was 0.06 V higher than that at baseline (p < .01), and the incidence of complications was 2.4%.
Conclusions:
LBBP is effective and safe in heart failure patients with LBBB, whether it is better than BVP needs to be verified by randomized controlled trials.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure


