Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

A Complete Method for Evaluating the Performance of Photocatalysts for the Degradation of Antibiotics in Environmental Remediation
Published on: October 6, 2022
Oral bacterial decontamination using an innovative prototype for photocatalytic disinfection
Matheus Albino Souza1, Daniela Jorge Corralo2, Ezequiel Santin Gabrielli2
1School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Building A7, Suite 2, São JoséPasso Fundo, RS, 99052-900, Brazil. matheus292@yahoo.com.br.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a prototype photocatalytic device for bacterial decontaminations of the oral cavity.
Methods:
Sixty-four subjects (18-65) were selected and randomly assigned to eight groups (n = 8), according to oral disinfection protocol: (G1): distilled water (control); (G2): 1.5% hydrogen peroxide (HP); (G3): 3.0% HP; (G4): 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX); (G5): Germinator; (G6): 1.5% HP + Germinator; (G7): 3.0%HP + Germinator; (G8): 0.12% CHX + Germinator. Stimulated saliva was collected before and after a 3-min mouthwash and/or Germinator application. The patients were kept relaxed and retained saliva 5-10 min, spitting out into the tube for 3 min. The percentage bacterial reduction was checked by counting the colony-forming units (CFUs) after culturing on blood agar plates. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 5%) for statistical significance.
Results:
The highest bacterial reduction was observed in groups 3 (3.0% HP), 6 (1.5% HP + Germinator), and 7 (3.0% + Germinator), with no statistically significant difference between them (p > 0.05). Groups 6 (1.5% HP + Germinator) and 8 (0.12% CHX + Germinator) showed higher bacterial reduction than groups 2 (1.5% HP) and 4 (0.12% CHX) (p < 0.05). Finally, group 5 (Germinator) showed higher bacterial reduction than control group (DW) and group 4 (0.12% CHX) (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
The photocatalytic disinfection was effective against oral bacteria and improved the antimicrobial action of 1.5% HP and 0.12%.
Clinical Significance:
The photocatalytic disinfection can be an alternative protocol to provide the oral decontamination.
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control

