Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The relationship between discharge destination and rehospitalization in Chinese patients with heart failure: a cohort study.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

Targeting the Nrf2/HO-1 aixs: A therapeutic strategy against regulated cell death in Alzheimer's disease.

Ageing research reviews·2026
Same author

The association of polypharmacy with intrinsic capacity: an analysis of the WHO ICOPE pilot data from Lianyungang, China.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Unraveling the role of PEGylation in the anti-aggregation stability of lipid nanoparticles.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Correction: Interplay of cGAS-STING and ferroptosis: crosstalk, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic prospects.

Archives of toxicology·2025
Same author

Exploring Regulatory Frameworks for Exosome Therapy: Insights and Perspectives.

Health care science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Step-specific Sorting of Mouse Spermatids by Flow Cytometry
06:31

Step-specific Sorting of Mouse Spermatids by Flow Cytometry

Published on: December 31, 2015

10.8K

[Comparative study of two high-efficiency methods for purifying spermatogonial stem cells].

Yan Zhang1, -Batu Baiyin1, Bo-Yang Yu1

  • 1School of Basic Medical Sciences.

Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi = Zhongguo Yingyong Shenglixue Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Applied Physiology
|November 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary

The differential attachment method and immunomagnetic bead method both isolate mouse spermatogonial stem cells (mSSCs). Immunomagnetic beads yield more cells, while differential attachment offers higher purity and is more economical for mSSC purification.

Keywords:
differential attachment methodimmunomagnetic bead methodmouseseminiferous tubulesspermatogonial stem cells

More Related Videos

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry
08:46

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 12, 2017

12.2K
Enrichment of Pachytene Spermatocytes and Spermatids from Mouse Testes Using Standard Laboratory Equipment
10:22

Enrichment of Pachytene Spermatocytes and Spermatids from Mouse Testes Using Standard Laboratory Equipment

Published on: September 17, 2019

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Step-specific Sorting of Mouse Spermatids by Flow Cytometry
06:31

Step-specific Sorting of Mouse Spermatids by Flow Cytometry

Published on: December 31, 2015

10.8K
A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry
08:46

A Standardized Approach for Multispecies Purification of Mammalian Male Germ Cells by Mechanical Tissue Dissociation and Flow Cytometry

Published on: July 12, 2017

12.2K
Enrichment of Pachytene Spermatocytes and Spermatids from Mouse Testes Using Standard Laboratory Equipment
10:22

Enrichment of Pachytene Spermatocytes and Spermatids from Mouse Testes Using Standard Laboratory Equipment

Published on: September 17, 2019

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive biology and stem cell research.
  • Investigating methods for isolating and purifying stem cells.

Background:

  • Mouse spermatogonial stem cells (mSSCs) are crucial for male fertility and regenerative medicine.
  • Efficient purification methods are essential for studying and utilizing mSSCs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the differential attachment method and immunomagnetic bead method for mSSC purification.
  • To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each method regarding cell yield, purity, and proliferation.

Main Methods:

  • Isolation of mSSCs from seminiferous tubule single cell suspensions of young C57BL/6 mice.
  • Purification using either the differential attachment method or immunomagnetic bead separation.
  • Comparison of cell number, separation efficiency, and in vitro culture characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Both methods successfully isolated mSSCs, which formed characteristic grape-cluster-like colonies in vitro.
  • Immunomagnetic bead method yielded a higher number of mSSCs (6x10^5) with a 3% recovery rate compared to differential attachment (3x10^5, 1.5% recovery).
  • Differential attachment resulted in higher purity mSSCs observed earlier (5 days) versus immunomagnetic beads (10 days), with no significant long-term growth impact.

Conclusions:

  • Both purification methods yield high-quality mSSCs but have distinct pros and cons.
  • Differential attachment is more economical and practical, requiring no special equipment, but yields fewer cells and takes longer.
  • Immunomagnetic bead separation provides a higher yield of mSSCs but is less economical and requires longer culture for colony observation.