Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Visual information and communication context as modulators of interpersonal coordination in face-to-face and
Veronica Romero1, Alexandra Paxton2
1Psychology Department, Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA.
Abstract:
Interpersonal coordination of body movement-or the similarity in patterning and timing of body movement between interaction partners over time-is a well-documented phenomenon in face-to-face (FTF) conversation. The present study will investigate the degree to which interpersonal coordination is impacted by the amount of visual information available and the type of interaction conversation partners are having. To do so within a naturalistic context, we take advantage of changes induced by the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has changed communication, with mitigation efforts having forced nearly everyone to engage over videoconferencing (VC) platforms (which limit body visibility but not face visibility) or to meet FTF with public health constraints (which limit face visibility but not body visibility). We will ask 69 pairs of participants to communicate in one of three ways: (1) socially distanced FTF while wearing masks; (2) VC in a laboratory where each partner will see one another's full torso; or (3) VC in a remote setting where each partner will see only one another's face and shoulders. Each pair will hold three conversations: (a) affiliative, (b) argumentative, and (c) task-based. We will quantify interpersonal coordination by extracting overall amounts of movement from videos of the participants using well-validated computer vision methods and then calculating the relationship between the two participants' movement using nonlinear time series analyses. In doing so, we will be able to identify the degree to which visual information and conversational context shape the emergence of interpersonal coordination within now-naturalistic modes of interaction.
Related Concept Videos
Channels of Non-Verbal Communication
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Non-Verbal Cues
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...

