Examining Social Identities of Patient Diversity Through Cases Presented in a Therapeutics Course Series

Objective. In pharmacy education, considerable debate surrounds the decision about whether didactic cases should include social identities, such as race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, ability, spirituality, nationality, and socioeconomic status. In considering what and how much of these identities to include, the first step could be to measure their current inclusion. This study aimed to quantify the presence of these social identities in cases presented to student pharmacists in a three-semester course series.Methods. One hundred forty-four cases presented in a three-semester pharmacotherapeutics course series were reviewed. The primary objective was to quantify the inclusion of each social identity. The secondary objective was to assess whether the identities were needed to answer specific questions related to each case. Cases were reviewed by two independent study researchers; a third impartial reviewer settled disagreements.Results. Cases rarely explicitly included social identities. Race was explicitly stated in 15% of cases (n = 21). Gender identity was explicitly named in two cases (1%), but nearly all cases implied gender through pronouns. Gender was necessary to answer case questions in approximately 20% of cases (n=27). Socioeconomic status, ability, sexual orientation, and nationality were infrequently named among all cases, at rates of 6%, 5%, 1%, and 1%, respectively.Conclusion. This study found that didactic cases rarely explicitly state social identities. In determining the next steps for integrating social identities, pharmacy education must first take stock of how it currently acknowledges these identities.