Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

04:54
Iterative Development of an Innovative Smartphone-Based Dietary Assessment Tool: Traqq
Published on: March 19, 2021
4.8K
Predicting meat consumption from concurrent, automatic appraisals: Introducing nuance to product appraisals.
Daria Altenburg1, Adriaan Spruyt1
1Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Appetite
|December 8, 2021
Summary
This study introduces a new tool to measure automatic product appraisals for meat and plant-based foods. Findings show these appraisals uniquely influence consumer behavior, impacting dietary choices and purchasing decisions.
Area of Science:
- Consumer Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Food Science
Background:
- Traditional research on product appraisals and consumer behavior often uses generic evaluations, which are insufficient for complex choices like meat vs. plant-based diets.
- Conflicting dimensions such as taste, health, ethics, and sustainability influence dietary preferences, necessitating a more nuanced measurement approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the limitations of generic product appraisal measures by developing and validating a novel tool for simultaneous assessment of multiple automatic appraisal dimensions.
- To investigate the distinct contributions of automatic appraisals (health, taste, price, sustainability, ethicality) of meat and vegetarian stimuli to consumer behavior.
Main Methods:
- Development and application of a novel tool to measure automatic appraisals across multiple dimensions (health, taste, price, sustainability, ethicality) for meat and vegetarian stimuli.
- Comparison of automatic and explicit appraisal measures against various outcome variables, including purchase likelihood, meat consumption reduction, willingness to pay, meat consumption frequency, and Body Mass Index (BMI).
Main Results:
- Automatic appraisals were found to represent unique constructs and demonstrated varying degrees of influence on consumer behavior.
- Significant differences were observed between automatic and explicit appraisal measures in predicting outcome variables.
- Individual automatic appraisals showed unique predictive power for consumer behavior related to meat and plant-based food choices.
Conclusions:
- The novel tool effectively captures distinct automatic appraisals, offering a more comprehensive understanding of consumer decision-making in food choices.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering multi-dimensional automatic appraisals to improve behavioral models and inform interventions aimed at dietary shifts.
- Future research should leverage multi-dimensional automatic appraisal measures to better understand and predict consumer behavior in the context of sustainable and healthy eating.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
12.5K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
12.5K
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Reason and Intuition
7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Confirmation Biases
7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
The Availability Heuristic
6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K

