Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

06:26
Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
524
Rescue of Failed Aortic Repair with Fenestrated Endovascular Device
Aoife Kiernan1, Mohamed Elsherif1, Brian Fahey1
1St James's Vascular Institute, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Annals of Vascular Surgery
|December 13, 2021
Summary
Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) offers a viable rescue strategy for failed aortic repairs, demonstrating high technical success and low 30-day mortality in high-risk patients. This advanced aortic repair technique addresses complications from previous endovascular or open surgeries.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Endovascular Interventions
- Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Background:
- Increasing incidence of failed endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) necessitates redo aortic repair in 10% of patients.
- Proximal type 1a endoleaks or proximal dilatation after EVAR/OR can be treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR).
- FEVAR utilizes custom-made grafts to extend the sealing zone to healthier thoracic aorta above visceral arteries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a single-center experience using fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) as a rescue therapy for failing aortic repairs.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Zenith Fenestrated endovascular (ZFEN) device in this challenging patient cohort.
- To assess technical success, complications, and survival rates in patients undergoing redo aortic repair with FEVAR.
Main Methods:
- A prospectively maintained database of FEVAR patients treated with the Zenith Fenestrated endovascular (ZFEN) device was analyzed.
- Patients who received the ZFEN device as rescue therapy after prior EVAR or OR were included.
- Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v 25 software.
Main Results:
- Seventeen ZFEN devices were implanted between January 2011 and March 2019 for failed EVAR (10 patients) or OR (7 patients).
- Primary technical success was 70.5%, with a 30-day re-intervention rate of 23.5%.
- Peri-operative complication rates were 5.8% for deployment-related issues and 35% for systemic complications; one-year survival was 92% with no mortality.
Conclusions:
- FEVAR is a safe yet technically demanding option for rescuing failing aortic repairs.
- Patients undergoing FEVAR are high-risk, reflected in significant post-operative morbidity.
- Despite challenges, FEVAR achieved high technical success and low 30-day mortality in this cohort.

