Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

45.8K
Overview
45.8K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

1.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
1.1K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.3K
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

779
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
779
Torts II01:13

Torts II

703
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
703
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III01:16

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

859
Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
859

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regulating invasive cosmetic procedures to reduce harm.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Blood, Autonomy and Ethical Practice: Insights from the 2024 European Court of Human Rights Decision of Mulla v Spain.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease: Public Health Insights from Coroners' Inquests.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Coronial Oversight of the Operation of and Access to Voluntary Assisted Dying Regimes.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Medical Termination of Pregnancy: Law and Controversies in the United States and Australia.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same author

Cystic Fibrosis and the Law: The Ramifications of New Treatments.

Journal of law and medicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice
07:33

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Published on: February 2, 2014

23.5K

Mandatory Vaccination Tensions and Litigation.

Ian Freckelton1

  • 1Barrister, Castan Chambers, Melbourne, Australia; Judge, Supreme Court of the Republic of Nauru; Professor of Law and Professorial Fellow, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne; Adjunct Professor of Forensic Medicine, Monash University; Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Journal of Law and Medicine
|December 15, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mandated COVID-19 vaccination for workers in Australia is largely lawful, prioritizing public health over individual rights. Legal challenges have generally upheld these vaccine directives, especially for healthcare workers.

Keywords:
COVID-19litigationmandatory vaccinationoccupational health and safetyvaccination passports

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

10.9K
Simultaneous Quantification of Anti-vector and Anti-transgene-Specific CD8+ T Cells Via MHC I Tetramer Staining After Vaccination with a Viral Vector
08:10

Simultaneous Quantification of Anti-vector and Anti-transgene-Specific CD8+ T Cells Via MHC I Tetramer Staining After Vaccination with a Viral Vector

Published on: November 28, 2018

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice
07:33

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice

Published on: February 2, 2014

23.5K
Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
08:52

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice

Published on: February 22, 2019

10.9K
Simultaneous Quantification of Anti-vector and Anti-transgene-Specific CD8+ T Cells Via MHC I Tetramer Staining After Vaccination with a Viral Vector
08:10

Simultaneous Quantification of Anti-vector and Anti-transgene-Specific CD8+ T Cells Via MHC I Tetramer Staining After Vaccination with a Viral Vector

Published on: November 28, 2018

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Law
  • Epidemiology
  • Sociology of Health

Background:

  • Community attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination vary globally.
  • Australia shows low overall opposition to vaccination, but some vocal dissent exists regarding "no jab, no work" policies.
  • Mandatory vaccination directives for specific worker categories, particularly in healthcare, have been implemented across Australian states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the legal standing of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies for workers in Australia.
  • To examine the balance between public health imperatives and individual rights in the context of pandemic response.
  • To assess the outcomes of legal challenges against "no jab, no work" directives.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal challenges and court decisions in Australian states.
  • Analysis of public opinion data on vaccination.
  • Examination of the legislative and policy frameworks surrounding mandatory vaccination for employment.

Main Results:

  • Legal challenges against mandatory vaccination directives have been largely unsuccessful.
  • Australian courts have generally upheld these directives, prioritizing community public health rights.
  • Decisions indicate a legal precedent favoring public health in pandemic situations.

Conclusions:

  • Mandatory vaccination policies for workers in Australia are likely to be deemed lawful in most cases.
  • The legal framework supports prioritizing community health rights over individual objections during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • These findings are particularly relevant given ongoing infection rates and Australia's international border status.