Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...

Trait Theory by Gordon Allport

Trait Theory by Gordon Allport

Gordon Allport, often regarded as the father of American personality psychology, developed a theory that emphasized the importance of understanding people in their present lives rather than focusing on their past, as psychoanalysis did. Allport believed that personality should be studied in healthy, well-adjusted individuals rather than those with psychological problems. He was particularly interested in defining traits, which he saw as fundamental mental structures that guide behavior across...

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Using Biclustering to Detect Cheating in Real Time on Mixed-Format Tests.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025

Same author

Analyzing and Comparing Univariate, Multivariate, and Bifactor Generalizability Theory Designs for Hierarchically Structured Personality Traits.

Journal of personality assessment·2023

Same author

Applying multivariate generalizability theory to psychological assessments.

Psychological methods·2023

Same author

A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2022

Same author

Expanding bifactor models of psychological traits to account for multiple sources of measurement error.

Psychological assessment·2022

Same author

Parentification in Polish Adolescents: a Prevalence Study.

Journal of child & adolescent trauma·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Interrelationships between latent state-trait theory and generalizability theory within a structural equation

Walter P Vispoel¹, Guanlan Xu¹, Wei S Schneider¹

¹Department of Psychological and Quantitative Foundations.

Psychological Methods

|December 16, 2021

Summary

Latent state-trait theory and generalizability theory both partition assessment data variation. This study demonstrates their similarities and differences using personality data, offering R package guidance.

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 9, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

Psychometrics
Psychological Measurement
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Latent state-trait theory (LST) and generalizability theory (GT) are established frameworks for understanding assessment data reliability and validity.
Both theories partition observed score variation into systematic and error components, but with different focuses.
LST separates state, trait, error, and method effects, while GT distinguishes universe score effects from measurement error sources.

Purpose of the Study:

To illustrate the similarities and differences between Latent State-Trait Theory (LST) and Generalizability Theory (GT).
To demonstrate how the same assessment data can be interpreted from both LST and GT perspectives.
To provide instructional materials for analyzing data using the R package for LST and GT.

Main Methods:

Application of Latent State-Trait Theory (LST) and Generalizability Theory (GT) to a personality measure dataset.
Comparative analysis of data interpretation from both theoretical frameworks.
Utilizing the R programming language for data analysis and supplemental material development.

Main Results:

The study highlights commonalities and distinctions between LST and GT in partitioning score variance.
Demonstrates the flexibility of interpreting a single dataset through both LST and GT lenses.
Identified practical applications of LST and GT in psychometric analysis.

Conclusions:

LST and GT offer complementary perspectives on assessment data reliability and validity.
The shared principles allow for integrated interpretation of measurement error.
Accessible R package resources facilitate the application of both LST and GT in research.