Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

8.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.4K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.7K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.7K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Bias01:22

Bias

8.1K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.1K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

30.3K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
30.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analyzing and Comparing Univariate, Multivariate, and Bifactor Generalizability Theory Designs for Hierarchically Structured Personality Traits.

Journal of personality assessment·2023
Same author

Applying multivariate generalizability theory to psychological assessments.

Psychological methods·2023
Same author

A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2022
Same author

Expanding bifactor models of psychological traits to account for multiple sources of measurement error.

Psychological assessment·2022
Same author

Interrelationships between latent state-trait theory and generalizability theory within a structural equation modeling framework.

Psychological methods·2021
Same author

Using Parallel Splits with Self-Report and Other Measures to Enhance Precision in Generalizability Theory Analyses.

Journal of personality assessment·2021
Same journal

A Kurtosis-Adjusted Bias Correction for the Standardized Mean Difference: Extending Hedges' <i>g</i> to Nonnormal Populations.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

A Simple Approach for Differential Test Functioning Based on Sum Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Factor Retention in Large Factor Analysis Models: A Simulation Study Comparing 15 Methods.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Agreement and Alignment in Binary Rating Tasks: Strategic Convergence as an Equilibrium Outcome.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Interactions Between Termination Criteria and Ability Estimators in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Identification and Diagnosis of Misreporting in Surveys.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.8K

Using Biclustering to Detect Cheating in Real Time on Mixed-Format Tests.

Hyeryung Lee1, Walter P Vispoel1

  • 1University of Iowa, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|May 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A novel biclustering method accurately detects cheating on diverse assessment formats in real time. This computationally efficient approach minimizes false positives, making it ideal for educational integrity monitoring.

Keywords:
aberrant respondingbiclusteringcheating detectionmachine learningtest security

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Data Mining
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Traditional methods struggle with complex, mixed-format assessments.
  • Real-time detection of academic dishonesty is crucial for maintaining assessment integrity.
  • Biclustering offers a flexible approach to identifying unusual response patterns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a real-time biclustering method for detecting cheating on mixed-format assessments.
  • To assess the method's accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability across various testing conditions.
  • To incorporate enhanced statistical tests for improved real-time detection and reduced false positives.

Main Methods:

  • A real-time biclustering algorithm was developed and applied to simulated assessment data.
  • The method jointly groups examinees and items based on response patterns.
  • Enhanced statistical significance tests were integrated to refine detection accuracy.

Main Results:

  • The biclustering method effectively detected cheating on both uniform and mixed-format assessments.
  • Strong detection performance was observed across varying proportions of cheaters, group sizes, and compromised items.
  • The method demonstrated high computational efficiency suitable for real-time applications with low false-positive rates.

Conclusions:

  • Biclustering is an adaptable and versatile tool for real-time cheating detection in educational assessments.
  • The enhanced method provides accurate and efficient identification of dishonest behavior across diverse item types.
  • This approach supports maintaining academic integrity in digital and mixed-format testing environments.