Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2025

06:46
In Vivo Functional Assessment of Rat Masseter Muscle Following Surgical Creation of a Volumetric Muscle Loss (VML) Injury
Published on: November 15, 2024
530
The perioral muscle continuum affects premaxillary development in Wistar rats
Feng Yang1, Weiwei Bian1, Rao Fu1
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai 200011, China.
American Journal of Translational Research
|December 27, 2021
Summary
Maintaining perioral muscle continuity is crucial for proper maxillary development. Disrupting muscle attachments significantly hinders premaxillary growth, impacting facial bone formation.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial development
- Skeletal biology
- Oral and maxillofacial surgery
Background:
- Craniofacial deformities stem from soft tissue and skeletal abnormalities.
- Muscle activity plays a vital role in facial bone growth, influenced by congenital and iatrogenic factors.
- Limited research exists on the impact of perioral muscle continuity on maxillary development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of perioral muscle continuity disruption on maxillary development.
- To understand the role of muscle function and attachment in premaxillary growth.
Main Methods:
- Mimic perioral muscle surgeries (incision, muscle stripping, periosteal stripping) were performed on 3-day-old Wistar rats.
- Groups included control, unilateral perioral muscle incision (MI), muscle incision with muscle stripping (MIMS), and muscle incision with periosteal stripping (MIPS).
- Micro-CT scans and hematoxylin-eosin staining were used for analysis after six weeks.
Main Results:
- All surgical groups exhibited significant premaxillary developmental defects on the affected side compared to controls.
- Premaxillary width and length were reduced on the affected side, especially in MIMS and MIPS groups.
- Significant differences in the premaxillary length ratio (affected vs. unaffected side) were observed between MI and MIMS groups.
Conclusions:
- Complete perioral muscle continuity with intact muscle attachment is essential for driving premaxillary development.
- Disruption of muscle continuity and periosteal integrity negatively impacts maxillary growth.
- Findings highlight the mechanical influence of perioral muscles on craniofacial skeletal development.
Keywords:
Craniofacial deformitybone developmentcephalometryfacial asymmetryperioral musculaturepremaxilla
