Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

24
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
24
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.7K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.0K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.0K
Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation01:30

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

11
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often...
11
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

5.0K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
5.0K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ANZ journal of surgeryยท2026
Same author

Living Donor Intestinal Transplant: Indication, Techniques, Surgical Complications, and Outcomes in Recipients and Donors: A Systematic Review.

Journal of transplantationยท2026
Same author

Comparing diverting and primary repair/anastomotic techniques for managing colorectal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Irelandยท2026
Same author

Surgical complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review.

Journal of visceral surgeryยท2026
Same author

Attenuated Salmonella as a PD-1/PD-L1 SiRNA delivery system for colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and melanoma: A systematic review.

Current research in translational medicineยท2026
Same author

Discovery of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) activators to promote intestinal mucosal healing.

European journal of medicinal chemistryยท2026
Same journal

A Protocol to Assess Contextual Factors During Program Impact Evaluation: A Case Study of a STEM Gender Equity Intervention in Higher Education.

The American journal of evaluationยท2024
Same journal

Mapping Evaluation Use: A Scoping Review of Extant Literature (2005-2022).

The American journal of evaluationยท2024
Same journal

Translating Evaluation Policy Into Practice in Government Organizations.

The American journal of evaluationยท2023
Same journal

Laying a Solid Foundation for the Next Generation of Evaluation Capacity Building: Findings from an Integrative Review.

The American journal of evaluationยท2023
Same journal

Empowering Indigenous Communities Through a Participatory, Culturally Responsive Evaluation of a Federal Program for Older Americans.

The American journal of evaluationยท2022
Same journal

Integrating Validity Evidence to Revise a Child Abuse Knowledge Test for Early Childhood Education Providers: A Mixed Methods Approach.

The American journal of evaluationยท2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Using the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Building Block Approach to Implement System

Ralph Renger1, Jessica Renger2, Marc D Basson3

  • 1Just Evaluation Services, LLC, Vail, AZ, USA.

The American Journal of Evaluation
|December 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

System evaluation theory (SET) was applied to a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) to foster interdependence among support cores. Integrating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) approach enhanced SET implementation for improved collaboration.

Keywords:
homeland security exercise and evaluationmixed methodssystem evaluation theorysystemssystems evaluation

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical research infrastructure evaluation
  • Translational science program assessment
  • Health systems research methodology

Background:

  • Clinical and Translational Research Centers (CTRs) require effective evaluation frameworks to ensure optimal function.
  • Evaluating interdependent support cores within CTRs presents unique systemic challenges.
  • Fostering a culture shift towards collaborative operations is crucial for CTR success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply System Evaluation Theory (SET) to evaluate a National Institutes of Health-funded CTR.
  • To assess the effectiveness of integrating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) approach within SET.
  • To facilitate a cultural shift in a CTR, promoting interdependence among support cores.

Main Methods:

  • Described the intended interdependent system of CTR support cores.
  • Applied SET principles to the CTR evaluation.
  • Incorporated the HSEEP building block approach to implement SET, examining alignment between HSEEP blocks and SET steps.
  • Focused on evaluating the impact of individual core processes on each other.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the successful application of SET to evaluate a CTR.
  • Showcased the utility of the HSEEP building block approach in supporting SET implementation.
  • Provided evidence for facilitating a culture shift towards interdependent operations among CTR support cores.
  • Identified systematic ways HSEEP building blocks align with SET steps to promote interdependence.

Conclusions:

  • SET is a suitable framework for evaluating complex CTR systems.
  • The HSEEP approach offers a structured method for implementing SET, particularly for fostering collaboration.
  • Integrating HSEEP with SET can effectively drive cultural change towards interdependent operations in research centers.
  • This combined approach has implications for future evaluations of similar research infrastructures.