Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Management of esophageal button battery ingestions: resource utilization and outcomes
Nir Atlas1, Elizabeth M Sinclair2, Harold K Simon3
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Insights
The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines for pediatric esophageal button battery ingestion (EBBI) increased hospital resource use without improving patient outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess costs and resource utilization post-guideline implementation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Hepatology
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Institutions are increasingly adopting the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines for managing pediatric esophageal button battery ingestion (EBBI).
- Evaluating the impact of these guidelines on clinical practice is crucial for optimizing patient care and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of NASPGHAN guidelines on in-hospital resource utilization.
- To evaluate short-term clinical outcomes in hemodynamically stable pediatric patients following endoscopic button battery removal.
- To compare resource use and outcomes between pre- and post-guideline implementation periods.
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective review of all EBBI admissions between 2010 and 2020.
- Patients were categorized into two groups: pre-guideline (2010-2015) and post-guideline (2016-2020).
- Analysis focused on in-hospital resource utilization (e.g., imaging, antibiotics, ICU admission, length of stay) and clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- The post-guideline group showed a significant increase in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use (8.7% vs. 71.4%, p < 0.001).
- Median antibiotic duration (0 vs. 6 days, p=0.01), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission (0 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), and total hospital length of stay (5 vs. 11.5 days, p=0.02) were significantly higher post-guideline.
- Despite normal imaging, two patients in the post-guideline group experienced delayed presentations (tracheoesophageal fistula and aorto-esophageal fistula), though all patients survived to discharge.
Conclusions:
- Implementation of NASPGHAN guidelines for EBBI management has led to increased resource utilization.
- The study found no improvement in short-term clinical outcomes despite increased resource use.
- Further research is warranted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and resource implications of post-guideline management strategies.
Purpose:
Institutions are adopting the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines for pediatric esophageal button battery ingestion (EBBI). Our objective was to evaluate the guidelines' impact on in-hospital resource utilization and short-term clinical outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients after endoscopic battery removal.
Methods:
A single-center retrospective review of all EBBI admissions from 2010 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on adoption of national guidelines: pre-guideline (2010-2015) and post-guideline (2016-2020).
Results:
Sixty-five patients were studied (pre-guideline n = 23; post-guideline n = 42). Compared with pre-guideline, post-guideline use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) increased (2/23 [8.7%]; 30/42 [71.4%]; p < 0.001). Post-guideline increases resulted for median days (IQR) receiving antibiotics (0 [0, 4]; 6 [3, 8]; p = 0.01), total pediatric intensive care unit admission (0 [0, 1]; 3 [0, 6]; p < 0.001), and total hospital length of stay (5 [2, 11]; 11.5 [4, 17]; p = 0.02). Two patients in the post-guideline group had delayed presentations despite normal imaging: one with TEF and one with aorto-esophageal fistula. All survived to discharge.
Conclusion:
In EBBI cases managed using the consensus based NASPHAGN guidelines, we report increased resource utilization without improved patient outcomes. Further research should evaluate post-guideline costs and resource utilization.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison

