Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
SAcubitril/valsartan versus ramipril in patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and cardiogenic
Ahmed Rezq1,2, Marwan Saad1,3, Mostafa El Nozahi1
1Department of Cardiology, Ain Shams University Cairo, Egypt.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan showed reduced heart failure hospitalizations compared to ramipril in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock. Further trials are needed to confirm long-term benefits of sacubitril/valsartan.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with cardiogenic shock has high mortality.
- Optimal medical therapy post-STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan against ramipril in STEMI patients experiencing cardiogenic shock.
- To evaluate major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving 100 patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
- Patients were randomized to receive either sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril after clinical stabilization.
- Primary outcome: MACE at 30 days and 6 months. Secondary outcomes: recurrent shock, vasoactive medication use, acute kidney injury (AKI), death, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in primary outcome (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months between sacubitril/valsartan and ramipril groups.
- No difference in in-hospital or 30-day clinical outcomes.
- At 6 months, sacubitril/valsartan group showed significantly lower hospitalization for heart failure (HF) compared to ramipril (18% vs 38%, P=0.044).
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan may offer improved clinical outcomes, specifically reduced HF hospitalizations, at 6 months in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock compared to ramipril.
- Larger randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are warranted to validate these findings.
Objectives:
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril in patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock.
Methods:
Patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock were randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril after clinical stabilization. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months. Secondary in-hospital clinical outcomes included recurrent shock, new or re-initiation of vasoactive medications, and acute kidney injury (AKI). All-cause death, cardiac death, hospitalization due to heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke were examined at 30 days and 6 months. Study ID 016-01-2018.
Results:
100 patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock were included (mean age 54.7±10.3 years, 87% men). Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan and ramipril occurred at 38.18±18.44 versus 39.0±21.03 hours after stabilization, respectively. The primary outcome was similar between both groups at 30 days and 6 months. No difference in in-hospital or 30-day clinical outcomes was observed. However, at 6 months, patients in the sacubitril/valsartan arm suffered less hospitalization with HF (18% vs 38%, P=0.044) compared with patients in the ramipril arm. Other clinical outcomes at 6 months were similar between both groups.
Conclusions:
Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with STEMI and cardiogenic shock may be associated with improved clinical outcome at 6 months compared with ramipril. Larger randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are recommended.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

