Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus01:25

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus

484
Evaluating the rectum and anus plays a crucial role in conducting a thorough physical examination of the gastrointestinal system. Although it may be uncomfortable and often embarrassing for the patient, it holds immense diagnostic value, particularly in detecting gastrointestinal diseases and abnormalities. This guide will explain how to perform this assessment using inspection and palpation methods.
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
484
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation

264
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
264
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

488
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
488
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

165
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
165
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy01:30

Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy

443
Various diagnostic tests are employed in the diagnostic process for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), particularly to differentiate between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
443
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography01:22

Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography

199
Voiding Cystourethrography (VCUG) and Cystography are specialized radiographic procedures used to examine the structure and function of the bladder and urethra.Voiding Cystourethrography (VCUG)A Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG) is a diagnostic imaging procedure that assesses the anatomy and function of the lower urinary tract. It focuses on the bladder, bladder neck, and urethra, helping detect abnormalities such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR)—the backward or reverse flow of urine into the...
199

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inter-Observer Variability of Gerd-Related Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and Calculation of the Milan Score.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2026
Same author

Rome V Criteria for Anorectal Disorders: The Good and the Useful.

Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Letter: Low-FODMAP Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Beyond the Hype! Authors' Reply.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Letter: Lost in Translation-Replicating a Modifying FODMAP Diet in Patients With IBS. Authors' Reply.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Presentation, Health Care Burden, and Risk Stratification.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2026
Same author

Medically Refractory Constipation With Colonic Hypercompliance: Comparison With Megacolon and Healthy Colon.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

7.0K

Diagnostic Strategy and Tools for Identifying Defecatory Disorders.

Adil E Bharucha1, Enrique Coss-Adame2

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
|February 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This review article examines various diagnostic tools used to identify defecatory disorders in constipated patients. It evaluates tests like anal manometry, rectal balloon expulsion, and MRI defecography. The authors emphasize that no single test is sufficient for diagnosis. Instead, test selection should be tailored to the individual patient's clinical features. Age and sex influence anorectal function, so results should be interpreted with reference to age- and sex-matched normal values. The review approach highlights the importance of a multifaceted diagnostic strategy for accurate diagnosis.

Keywords:
Anal sphincterBiofeedback therapyConstipationHigh-resolution anorectal manometryMRIdefecatory disorder diagnosisgastrointestinal motilityclinical diagnostic techniquesanorectal function assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
07:41

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: April 17, 2019

10.0K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

627

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

7.0K
Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
07:41

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Published on: April 17, 2019

10.0K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

627

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology and motility disorders
  • Diagnostic imaging techniques in clinical medicine

Background:

Understanding the causes of constipation requires identifying specific defecatory disorders. Prior research has shown that a range of diagnostic tools can be used to assess anorectal function. However, no single test provides a complete picture of bowel dysfunction. That uncertainty drove the need for a comprehensive review of available techniques. It was already known that age and sex influence anorectal function, yet few guidelines address how to interpret results in this context. This gap motivated the authors to examine the diagnostic landscape. No prior work had resolved how to sequence tests for optimal diagnostic accuracy. The review approach aimed to clarify this by analyzing existing literature. The synthesis of findings suggests that individualized testing is essential for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review was to evaluate diagnostic tools for defecatory disorders in constipated patients. The specific problem addressed is the lack of a standardized, evidence-based diagnostic sequence. The motivation comes from the variability in test interpretation and patient-specific factors. The authors propose that a tailored diagnostic strategy improves diagnostic accuracy. The review approach focused on identifying the clinical relevance of each test. The goal was to provide a framework for clinicians to follow. The study emphasizes the importance of age- and sex-matched reference values. The synthesis of findings suggests that no single test is sufficient for diagnosis.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved analyzing published literature on defecatory disorder diagnostics. The authors examined techniques such as anal manometry and defecography. They assessed the indications and limitations of each diagnostic method. The review approach included evaluating the clinical utility of rectal balloon expulsion tests. The authors compared the strengths and weaknesses of various diagnostic tools. They considered how test results should be interpreted in the context of patient age and sex. The review approach emphasized the need for individualized testing sequences. The synthesis of findings highlights the importance of integrating clinical features with test results.

Main Results:

The key findings from the literature suggest that no single diagnostic test is sufficient for diagnosing defecatory disorders. Anal manometry provides detailed information on anorectal pressures. Rectal balloon expulsion tests assess functional defecation ability. Barium and MRI defecography visualize structural abnormalities. Assessment of rectal compliance and sensation helps identify sensory dysfunction. Colonic transit studies evaluate whole-gut motility. The synthesis of findings indicates that test selection should be individualized. The authors propose that diagnostic accuracy improves when tests are interpreted in the context of clinical features.

Conclusions:

The synthesis and implications of the literature suggest that a multifaceted diagnostic approach is necessary. The authors emphasize the importance of age- and sex-matched reference values. They propose that diagnostic tests should be selected based on clinical features. The review approach highlights the variability in test interpretation. The synthesis of findings indicates that no single test is sufficient for diagnosis. The authors suggest that clinicians should consider multiple tests in sequence. The review approach underscores the need for individualized testing strategies. The authors propose that diagnostic accuracy improves with a tailored approach.

The main outcome is that no single diagnostic test is sufficient for diagnosing defecatory disorders.

This test assesses functional defecation ability by measuring the time to expel a balloon.

Age affects anorectal function, so results should be compared to age-matched normal values.

MRI defecography visualizes structural abnormalities during bowel movements.

Colonic transit testing evaluates whole-gut motility, not just anorectal function.

The authors propose that diagnostic tests should be selected and interpreted in the context of clinical features.