Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining the Serial Advantage in Fluent and Dysfluent Readers.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)·2026
Same author

Dynamic adjustment of the eye-voice span and articulation duration in the course of multi-item naming tasks: Evidence for lockout scheduling.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Laparoscopic pectopexy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP): how, why, when: a narrative review of the literature.

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2025
Same author

Cognitive control beyond single-item tasks: Insights from pupillometry, gaze, and behavioral measures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023
Same author

Lexical stress representation in spoken word recognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2021
Same author

Dyslexia: Still Not a Neurodevelopmental Disorder.

Brain sciences·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K

Task format modulates the relationship between reading ability and Stroop interference.

Laoura Ziaka1, Dimitra Skoteinou1, Athanassios Protopapas2

  • 1Department of Philosophy and History of Science.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|February 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Reading skills correlate with Stroop interference, but not through direct inhibition. The relationship is indirect, influenced by how efficiently the brain processes successive items in tasks like the multi-item Stroop.

More Related Videos

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.5K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K
The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
07:21

The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content

Published on: June 29, 2016

39.5K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Stroop interference and reading ability are negatively correlated.
  • A proposed explanation involves the speed of inhibiting task-irrelevant information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between reading ability and Stroop interference across different task formats.
  • To test whether inhibition speed directly explains the reading-interference link.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from six experiments involving single-item and multi-item Stroop tasks.
  • Correlation of Stroop task performance with various reading measures.

Main Results:

  • Reading performance was significantly related to the multi-item Stroop task.
  • No significant relationship was found between reading performance and the single-item Stroop task.
  • These findings challenge the direct inhibition-interference model.

Conclusions:

  • The link between reading and Stroop interference is likely indirect.
  • Cascaded processing and control of successive item processing are key cognitive mechanisms.
  • Efficient temporal overlap in processing adjacent items influences the reading-interference relationship.