Whatever happened to reversion?

The idea of 'reversion' or 'atavism' has a peculiar history. For many authors in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries - including Darwin, Galton, Pearson, Weismann, and Spencer, among others - reversion was one of the central phenomena which a theory of heredity ought to explain. By only a few decades later, however, Fisher and others could look back upon reversion as a historical curiosity, a non-problem, or even an impediment to clear theorizing. I explore various reasons that reversion might have appeared to be a central problem for this first group of figures, focusing on their commitment to a variety of conceptual features of evolutionary theory; discuss why reversion might have then ceased to be an interesting phenomenon; and, finally, close with some more general thoughts about the death of scientific problems.