Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2025

14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
6.0K
Is Work Time Control Good for Innovation? A Two-Stage Study to Verify the Mediating and Moderating Processes
Xiao Pan1,2, Xiaokang Zhao1, Huali Shen1,3
1Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.
Frontiers in Psychology
|February 18, 2022
Summary
Work time control enhances knowledge employee innovation by fostering job engagement. Vocational delay of gratification further boosts this effect, highlighting the importance of autonomy and self-regulation for workplace creativity.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Workplace Innovation
- Human Resource Management
Background:
- Work time control is a key job resource influencing employee innovation.
- The job demands-resources model and self-regulation theory provide frameworks for understanding this relationship.
- Previous research has established a link between work time control and innovation, but mediating and moderating mechanisms require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the impact of work time control on knowledge employees' innovation.
- To verify the mediating role of job engagement and the moderating role of vocational delay of gratification in the work time control-innovation relationship.
Main Methods:
- A two-stage study was conducted, including a laboratory test (Study 1) and a survey of 254 knowledge employees (Study 2).
- Study 1 utilized the job demands-resources model to explore relationships between work time control, job engagement, job burnout, and innovation.
- Study 2 employed regression analysis, controlling for demographic variables, job demands, and neuroticism, to test the proposed mediation and moderation hypotheses.
Main Results:
- Job engagement significantly mediates the relationship between work time control and innovation.
- Vocational delay of gratification moderates the effect of work time control on innovation, with higher levels of gratification buffering the positive impact.
- Work time control is confirmed as a crucial factor for fostering employee innovation.
Conclusions:
- Empirical evidence supports the mediating role of job engagement and the moderating role of vocational delay of gratification in the work time control-innovation link.
- Organizations should implement strategies that enhance work time control and cultivate self-regulation skills among employees.
- Managerial practices encouraging autonomy and self-control training are recommended to promote innovation within a Chinese cultural context.
Keywords:
innovationjob demands-resources model (JD-R model)knowledge employeeself-regulation theoryworking time controlMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Workability
148
The workability of concrete is a critical characteristic that influences the ease of mixing, handling, and finishing the concrete. It is affected by several factors including water content, aggregate properties, and admixtures like air entrainment. Water plays a fundamental role as it lubricates the concrete mix, facilitating easier movement and placement. However, the water requirement varies depending on the texture and shape of aggregates. Finer particles and angular, rough-textured...
148
Impact of Individuals on a Group
26
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
26
Factorial Design
13.3K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.3K
Two-Way ANOVA
2.8K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.8K
The Scientific Method
63.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
63.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K

