Outcomes of Talar Osteochondral and Transchondral Lesions Using an Algorithmic Approach Based on Size, Location, and...

The management of transchondral and osteochondral talar lesions has evolved, with microfracturing originally considered the best initial treatment. Despite talar lesions being a tri-dimensional defect, most studies use 2-dimensional parameters to grade them. We propose in this study that tri-dimensional sizing may be more appropriate in evaluation for treatment. The present study evaluated the outcomes of treatment of talar lesions performed by a single surgeon, creating and using an algorithm based on volume, location, and integrity of the subchondral plate. The lesions were classified as "small" (up to 125 mm³), "medium" (125 mm³-1500 mm³), and "large" (>1500 mm³) based upon evaluation of the preoperative magnetic resonance imagining. Location of the lesion was also noted on a 9-region grid pattern of the talar dome. These 3 parameters dictated whether a lesion required microfracturing or retrograde drilling, autogenous or allogenous bone graft, and whether an open versus an arthroscopic approach was required. Over a 10-year period, surgery was performed on 204 lesions. Overall, the average time to return to activity was 7.93 ± 5.00 (range 2-36) months. The average preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score was 76.44 ± 10.98 (range 52-86), and the average postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score was 96.12 ± 3.46 (range 81-100), p = .0001. By using the proposed algorithm, the outcome and return to activity for most patients can be better predicted, regardless of the size or location of the osteochondral lesion. The treatment algorithm implemented in the present investigation yielded overall acceptable results, with only 7 of the 204 lesions needing additional surgery.