Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Adjustable Stiffness, External Fixator for the Rat Femur Osteotomy and Segmental Bone Defect Models
Published on: October 9, 2014
Comparison of 3 Dynamic External Fixation Devices for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations in
Christopher M Daniels1, Pooyan Abbasi2, Kavya K Sanghavi2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, NY.
Purpose:
Several improvised dynamic external fixation devices are used for treating unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations. We compared the effectiveness of 3 constructs for simulated dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations in a cadaver model.
Methods:
We tested 30 digits from 10 fresh-frozen, thawed cadaver hands. We aimed to remove the palmar 50% of the base of each digit's middle phalanx (P2), simulating an unstable dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocation. Each PIP joint was then stabilized via external fixation with either a pins-and-rubber-bands construct, pins-only construct, or tuberculin syringe-pins construct. We allocated 10 digits per fixation group. The finger tendons were secured to a computer-controlled stepper motor-driven linear actuator. Via this mechanism, all PIP joints were taken through 1,400 cycles of flexion-extension. With the PIP joint in neutral extension, we measured the P2 dorsal translation at baseline, after fixator stabilization, and after the motion protocol.
Results:
The actual mean P2 palmar defect created was 48% of the base. All PIP joints were unstable after creating the defect, with a mean initial P2 dorsal displacement of 3.7 mm. After application of the fixators, all PIP joint dislocations were reduced. The median residual P2 dorsal displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group, 0.1 mm for the pins-only group, and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. There were no cases of PIP joint redislocation after flexion-extension cycling, and the median dorsal P2 displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group; 0.0 mm for the pins-only group; and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group.
Conclusions:
All 3 external fixators restored PIP joint stability following simulated dorsal fracture-dislocation, with all reductions maintained after motion testing. The syringe-pins construct had significantly greater median residual P2 dorsal displacement after the initial reduction and motion testing, which is of unclear clinical importance.
Clinical Relevance:
This study informs surgeon decision-making when considering dynamic external fixator options for dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations.
More Related Videos
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
05:34A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
Published on: May 20, 2019