Impact of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction on long-term outcomes in cardiac contractility modulation
Gökhan Yücel1,2, Christian Fastner1,2, Svetlana Hetjens3
1First Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Insights
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy may offer better long-term systolic recovery for heart failure patients with lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 30%). Clinical improvements, however, were similar across LVEF groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is used for symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) patients with narrow QRS complex.
- CCM can improve reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but the impact of pre-implantation LVEF on long-term outcomes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term outcomes of CCM therapy in heart failure patients with lower (≤ 30%) versus higher (≥ 31%) pre-implantation LVEF.
- To assess the influence of baseline LVEF on survival, echocardiographic parameters, and clinical status post-CCM implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 172 heart failure patients who underwent CCM implantation between 2002-2019.
- Patients were stratified into two groups based on baseline LVEF: Group 1 (≤ 30%) and Group 2 (≥ 31%).
- Comparison of survival, LVEF, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), NYHA class, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) scores up to 5 years post-implantation.
Main Results:
- Baseline LVEF did not impact patient survival.
- Patients with lower baseline LVEF (≤ 30%) demonstrated significantly better recovery in echocardiographic parameters, including LVEF and TAPSE.
- Both groups showed comparable improvements in clinical parameters like NYHA class and MLWHFQ scores.
Conclusions:
- Pre-implantation LVEF ≤ 30% may be associated with better long-term biventricular systolic recovery potential with CCM therapy.
- Clinical improvements in heart failure symptoms, assessed by NYHA class and MLWHFQ, can be achieved irrespective of baseline LVEF.
Background:
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM), being reserved for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) and narrow QRS complex under guideline directed medical therapy, can recover initially reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); however, the influence of pre-implantation LVEF on long-term outcomes is not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the effects of lower and higher preimplantation LVEF on long-term outcomes in CCM-therapy.
Methods:
One-hundred seventy-two patients from our single-centre registry were retrospectively included (2002-2019). Follow-up data were collected up to 5 years after implantation. Patients were divided into Group 1 (baseline LVEF≤ 30%) and Group 2 (≥ 31%). Both groups were compared based on differences in survival, echocardiographic- and clinical parameters including LVEF, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), NYHA class or Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire-score (MLWHFQ).
Results:
11% of the patients did have a LVEF ≥31%. Mean LVEF ± SD for both groups were 21.98 ± 5.4 versus 35.2 ± 3.7%, respectively. MLWHFQ (47 ± 21.2 vs. 42±21.4) and mean peak oxygen consumption (VO2, 13.6 ± 4.1 vs. 12.7 ± 2.8 ml/kg/min) were comparable between both groups. LVEF-grouping did not influence survival. Lower baseline LVEF resulted in significantly better recovery of echocardiographic parameters such as LVEF and TAPSE. Irrespective from baseline LVEF, both groups showed nearly comparable improvements for clinical parameters like NYHA-class and MLWHFQ.
Conclusion:
Long-term biventricular systolic recovery potential in CCM-therapy might be better for preimplantation LVEF values ≤30%, whereas clinical parameters such as NYHA-class can improve irrespective from baseline LVEF.
More Related Videos
08:47Evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in 2D Human Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Published on: December 16, 2022
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
