Passive Manipulation for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Contractures

We investigated closed passive manipulation as an alternative to surgery for certain proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension contractures.

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with PIP joint extension contractures treated with passive manipulation at our institution between 2015 and 2019. The included patients were a minimum of 12 weeks from their initial injury/surgery (median 179 days; interquartile range: 130-228 days), had plateaued with therapy, and underwent a 1-time passive manipulation. All included fingers had congruent PIP joints and no indwelling hardware that could have had direct adhesions. Most (80%) patients had a direct injury to the finger ray(s) that led to the contractures. Most (75%) patients had the manipulation performed under local anesthesia in the office. Available measures of passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) immediately, within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks after the manipulation were recorded.

Twenty-eight patients and 46 digits met the criteria. The median PIP joint PROM improved from 50° to 90° immediately following the manipulation. The median PROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks following manipulation were 80°, 85°, and 85°, respectively. The median AROM immediately after the manipulation improved from 40° to 90°, and the median AROM values within 6 weeks, between 6 and 12 weeks, and at >12 weeks were 70°, 50°, and 60°, respectively. None of the patients experienced worsening of PIP joint range of motion. One patient who had 4 fingers manipulated had a 45° distal interphalangeal joint extension lag for one of the fingers after the manipulation. Eight fingers underwent later flexor tenolysis or reconstruction to improve AROM after the gains in PROM via manipulation were maintained.

Passive manipulation is an alternative to surgical release for select PIP joint extension contractures.

Therapeutic IV.