Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

190
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
190
Implicit Memories01:24

Implicit Memories

208
Implicit memories, also known as non-declarative memories, are long-term memories that function outside of conscious awareness. These memories influence behavior and skills without explicit knowledge. This type of memory is evident in tasks like playing tennis, snowboarding, and texting. Implicit memory has three subsystems: procedural memory, conditioning, and priming. This type of memory is essential in various activities, from everyday tasks to specialized skills.
One key aspect of implicit...
208

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Cervical spinal cord stimulation disrupts proprioception yet improves voluntary arm reaching.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A systematic investigation reveals dissociable effects of ageing on implicit and explicit components of sensorimotor learning.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Minimal Impact of Low Vision on Explicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

How to conduct behavioural experiments online.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K

Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning.

Jonathan S Tsay1,2, Adrian M Haith3, Richard B Ivry1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|March 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Task errors alone do not drive implicit motor recalibration. Sensory prediction errors, modulated by task errors and attention, are crucial for adapting movements in changing environments.

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.8K
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

547.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

8.6K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

1.8K
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

547.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Implicit motor recalibration enables adaptation to new environments.
  • Traditionally, sensory prediction errors were considered the sole drivers of this adaptation.
  • Recent evidence suggests task errors also play a role.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the independent and interactive roles of sensory prediction errors and task errors in implicit motor recalibration.
  • Determine if task errors alone can drive recalibration.
  • Explore the influence of attention on this process.

Main Methods:

  • Induced task errors without sensory prediction errors by mid-movement target displacement.
  • Simultaneously varied sensory prediction errors and task errors.
  • Utilized a computational model to integrate findings.

Main Results:

  • Task errors alone did not induce implicit motor recalibration.
  • Recalibration driven by sensory prediction errors was modulated by task errors.
  • Attention, by flickering the target, attenuated recalibration.
  • A computational model successfully accounted for the observed interactions.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit motor recalibration is not solely driven by task errors.
  • Sensory prediction errors and task errors interact, with attention modulating their influence.
  • A unified computational framework explains the interplay of these factors in motor adaptation.