Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

459
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
459

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

UXpedite Learning Design: Bridging Instructional Design and Software Engineering for Effective Augmented Reality Learning Environments.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2025
Same author

Pupillary Responses for Cognitive Load Measurement to Classify Difficulty Levels in an Educational Video Game: Empirical Study.

JMIR serious games·2021
Same author

Testing multiple polynomial models for eye-tracker calibration.

Behavior research methods·2020
Same author

Boron and Coumaphos Residues in Hive Materials Following Treatments for the Control of Aethina tumida Murray.

PloS one·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

1.9K

Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response.

Hugo Mitre-Hernandez1, Jorge Sanchez-Rodriguez1, Sergio Nava-Muñoz1

  • 1Unidad Zacatecas, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, A.C., Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico.

Peerj
|April 4, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Classifying memorization task difficulty using pupillary response data is feasible. A random forest model achieved an 82% F1-score, enabling cognitive load assessment via pupil size features.

Keywords:
ClassifiersCognitive loadPupil sizeWorking memory

More Related Videos

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K
Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

1.9K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K
Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Educational Technology

Background:

  • Task difficulty assessment is vital for optimizing learning outcomes.
  • Pupillary response data offers a potential, non-invasive measure of cognitive load.
  • Inter-subject variability in pupil responses presents a significant challenge for classifier development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To classify the difficulty level of memorization tasks using pupillary response data.
  • To investigate the efficacy of various machine learning classifiers for this task.
  • To identify key pupillometric features indicative of task difficulty.

Main Methods:

  • Collected eye-tracking data from students performing low-, medium-, and high-difficulty memorization tasks.
  • Performed statistical analysis on pupillometric features like peak dilation and pupil diameter change.
  • Employed a wrapper method to select optimal features for Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF) classifiers.

Main Results:

  • Significant statistical differences were observed in pupillometric features across different task difficulty levels.
  • A Random Forest classifier, trained with five selected features, achieved the highest F1-score of 82%.
  • The study demonstrates the potential of pupil size features for difficulty classification.

Conclusions:

  • Pupillary response data can be effectively utilized to classify memorization task difficulty.
  • The developed method offers a promising approach for evaluating cognitive load non-invasively.
  • This research contributes to personalized learning and adaptive educational systems.