Open science and multicultural research: Some data, considerations, and recommendations

Area of Science:

• Psychological Science
• Cultural Diversity Science
• Open Science

Background:

• Ethnic Minority and Diversity (EM/D) research prioritizes cultural competency for understanding diverse populations.
• Open Science (OS) emphasizes data sharing and statistical rigor for mainstream research replicability.
• A bifurcation exists between EM/D and OS, potentially limiting the integration of diverse perspectives in psychological science.

Approach:

• Study 1: Reviewed editorial policies and empirical articles in EM/D journals for OS adoption.
• Study 2: Conducted a national mixed-methods survey of EM/D scholars and editors on OS views.
• Study 3: Surveyed community members on data sharing and science credibility.

Key Points:

• EM/D journals showed varied OS policies, with low adoption rates (32/823 articles).
• Scholars and editors expressed concerns about OS's impact on EM/D research and ethical risks.
• Community participants were receptive to data sharing and viewed psychological science favorably.

Conclusions:

• Recommendations are provided for integrating transparency, humility, and cultural competency into psychological research.
• Addressing the bifurcation can enhance the validity and inclusivity of psychological science.
• Culturally informed open science practices are crucial for advancing psychological knowledge.