Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.0K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.0K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

524
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
524
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

266
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
266
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

12
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
12
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

631
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
631
Perception01:28

Perception

629
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
629

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Cerebral Basis for Visual Discomfort and Visual Stress.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Self-directed speech and attention deficit hyperactive disorder-like behaviours.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2025
Same author

How to eliminate (and even reverse) egocentric bias in perspective taking.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Are visual artists better visual perspective takers? An exploratory study with an unexpected outcome.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024
Same author

Is trypophobia real?

BJPsych open·2024
Same author

Teleporting into walls? The irrelevance of the physical world in embodied perspective-taking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.3K

Visual perspective taking without visual perspective taking.

Steven Samuel1, Madeline J Eacott1, Geoff G Cole1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|April 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many adults struggle with visual perspective-taking tasks, incorrectly interpreting what another person sees. Approximately 12-21% of participants in this study failed to adopt an agent-centered view, demonstrating a common cognitive bias.

More Related Videos

A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras
03:56

A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.6K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.3K
A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras
03:56

A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.6K
Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual perspective-taking is crucial for social interaction.
  • Understanding how individuals process others' viewpoints is key to cognitive development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the proportion of adults using a stimulus-centered strategy over an agent-centered one in a visual perspective-taking task.
  • To investigate errors in visual perspective-taking and their cognitive underpinnings.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed an agent observing a number (69) presented upside down from the participant's viewpoint.
  • Participants were asked to identify the number seen by the agent.
  • The study measured the frequency of incorrect responses (96) indicative of a stimulus-centered approach.

Main Results:

  • 12-21% of adult participants incorrectly reported the number as '96'.
  • This error suggests a reliance on a stimulus-centered strategy, ignoring the agent's perspective.
  • Correct responses (69) were achieved through either an agent-centered approach or an egocentric error.

Conclusions:

  • A significant minority of adults exhibit difficulties with accurate visual perspective-taking.
  • The findings highlight the prevalence of stimulus-centered processing in visual perspective-taking tasks.
  • Results inform theories of mental representation, cognitive content, and Theory of Mind.