Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cycle-dependent variation of tumor absorbed dose rates in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

Beyond the tumor: Recurrence-prone radiomics for prognostication in negative PSMA PET/CT scans of prostate cancer.

Biomedical physics & engineering express·2026
Same author

Kernel-based Maximum likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity (MLAA) in SPECT imaging for improved attenuation correction and activity quantification: Simulation, phantom and patient validation studies.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

A Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network Framework for Multi-Horizon Stroke Mortality Prediction.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions Using Wearables and Smartphone Applications for Individuals With Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

A clinically anchored radiomics dictionary for explainable TI-RADS-based thyroid nodule classification in ultrasound; dictionary version TU1.0.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Intense Incidental F-18 DOPA Uptake in Low-grade Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of HER2-Targeted and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Axillary Lymph Node Metastases Among Newly Diagnosed HER2-Positive and HER2-Low Breast Cancer.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Epileptogenic Brain Metastasis Early Positive on 18FDG PET/CT Compared to MRI.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Dural Manifestation of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis​: Multimodality Imaging Approach.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

Malignant Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumor (PEComa) of Left Adrenal Gland With Extensive Intravenous Tumor Thrombi: 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
Same journal

18F-MFBG Uptake From Multiple Focal "Hot Spots" to Superscan in a Pediatric Patient With High-risk Neuroblastoma.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K

Decentralized Distributed Multi-institutional PET Image Segmentation Using a Federated Deep Learning Framework.

Isaac Shiri1, Alireza Vafaei Sadr, Mehdi Amini1

  • 1From the Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital.

Clinical Nuclear Medicine
|April 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Federated deep learning (DL) for PET image segmentation shows performance comparable to centralized DL. This approach enhances data privacy and enables robust, generalizable segmentation across multiple centers.

More Related Videos

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

9.4K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

536

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K
Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

9.4K
Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique
04:48

Swin-PSAxialNet: An Efficient Multi-Organ Segmentation Technique

Published on: July 5, 2024

536

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Deep learning (DL) algorithm generalizability relies on diverse, large datasets.
  • Sharing medical images between institutions is hindered by patient privacy, ethical, and legal concerns.
  • Multicentric data is crucial for robust medical AI but difficult to aggregate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a federated deep learning (DL) framework for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image segmentation.
  • To evaluate the performance of the federated DL model against a traditional centralized DL approach.
  • To address challenges in multicentric medical image data sharing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized PET images from 405 head and neck cancer patients across 9 centers.
  • Developed a federated DL model using a modified R2U-Net architecture, comparing it to a centralized model pooling all data.
  • Assessed segmentation performance using Dice and Jaccard coefficients and quantitative accuracy of PET parameters (e.g., SUVpeak, SUVmean, MTV, TLG).

Main Results:

  • Federated and centralized DL models achieved nearly identical performance for segmentation metrics (Dice: 0.84 ± 0.06 vs 0.84 ± 0.05; Jaccard: 0.73 ± 0.08 vs 0.73 ± 0.07).
  • Comparable relative errors (RE%) were observed for quantitative PET parameters like SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis between the two methods.
  • No statistically significant performance differences were found between the federated and centralized DL frameworks (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • The federated DL model demonstrates quantitative performance on par with the centralized DL model for PET image segmentation.
  • Federated DL offers a viable solution for creating robust and generalizable segmentation models.
  • This approach effectively navigates patient privacy and data sharing restrictions in multicentric clinical research.