Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

11:12
Determination of the Optimal Chromosomal Locations for a DNA Element in Escherichia coli Using a Novel Transposon-mediated Approach
Published on: September 11, 2017
7.7K
Software evaluation for de novo detection of transposons
Matias Rodriguez1, Wojciech Makałowski2
1Institute of Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Mobile DNA
|April 28, 2022
Summary
Identifying transposable elements (TEs) is crucial for understanding genome evolution. RepeatModeler excelled in de novo TE detection, but fragmentation and missed elements highlight the need for expert manual curation.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Transposable elements (TEs) are significant genomic components in eukaryotes, driving genome evolution.
- Accurate identification of TEs is challenging, necessitating the development of specialized computational tools.
- Numerous de novo TE detection tools exist, but their comparative performance requires thorough evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate and compare the performance of widely used de novo transposable element detection tools.
- To assess tool efficacy on both simulated and curated genomic datasets.
- To identify common challenges and limitations in current TE identification methodologies.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of multiple de novo TE detection software.
- Performance testing using simulated genomic data.
- Performance testing using well-curated genomic sequences from established databases.
Main Results:
- TE-model-based tools generally outperformed k-mer counting approaches.
- RepeatModeler demonstrated superior performance across most tested datasets.
- A common limitation observed was the fragmented identification of TE regions, with frequent failure to detect small or fragmented TEs.
Conclusions:
- While RepeatModeler shows promise, current de novo TE detection tools often produce fragmented results and miss smaller elements.
- Accurate transposable element annotation remains a complex task requiring significant manual curation by experts.
- This study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate TE detection tools and understanding the comparability of their outputs.
Related Concept Videos
DNA-only Transposons
14.8K
DNA-only transposons are called autonomous transposons since they code for the enzyme transposase that is required for the transposition mechanism. Insertion of transposons can alter gene functions in multiple ways. They can mutate the gene, alter gene expression by introducing a novel promoter or insulator sequence, introduce new splice sites, and change the mRNA transcripts produced, or remodel chromatin structure.
The donor site from where the transposon is excised is either degraded or...
The donor site from where the transposon is excised is either degraded or...
14.8K
Overview of Transposition and Recombination
16.2K
Transposons make up a significant part of genomes of various organisms. Therefore, it is believed that transposition played a major evolutionary role in speciation by changing genome sizes and modifying gene expression patterns. For example, in bacteria, transposition can lead to conferring antibiotic resistance. Movement of transposable elements within the genetic pool of pathogenic bacteria can aid in transfer of antibiotic-resistant genetic elements. In eukaryotes, transposons can carry out...
16.2K
Transposons
207
Transposons, or "jumping genes," are small mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that range from 700 to 40,000 base pairs in length. They are found in all organisms and can move within the same chromosome or transfer to different chromosomes. In some cases, transposons can also jump between different host DNA molecules, such as plasmids or viruses, contributing to genetic variability.Barbara McClintock first discovered these mobile genetic elements in the 1940s while studying maize genetics, and she...
207
Non-LTR Retrotransposons
12.0K
As the name suggests, non-LTR retrotransposons lack the long terminal repeats characteristic of the LTR retrotransposons. Additionally, both LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons use distinct mechanisms of mobilization. Non-LTR retrotransposons are further divided into two classes - Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), both of which occur abundantly in most mammals, including humans. Some of the active non-LTR retrotransposons in humans are L1...
12.0K
LTR Retrotransposons
18.0K
LTR retrotransposons are class I transposable elements with long terminal repeats flanking an internal coding region. These elements are less abundant in mammals compared to other class I transposable elements. About 8 percent of human genomic DNA comprises LTR retrotransposons. Some of the common examples of LTR retrotransposons are Ty elements in yeast and Copia elements in Drosophila.
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
The internal coding region of LTR retrotransposons and their mechanism of transposition closely resembles a...
18.0K

