Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Remote Laboratory Management: Respiratory Virus Diagnostics
Published on: April 6, 2019
Development of Evidence-Based COVID-19 Management Guidelines for Local Context: The Methodological Challenges
Sarah Nadeem1,2, Salima Saleem Aamdani1, Bushra Ayub1
1CITRIC Centre for Clinical Best Practices, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Insights
This study highlights challenges in updating COVID-19 treatment guidelines. Corticosteroids are strongly recommended, but tocilizumab evidence conflicts, while antibiotics and ivermectin are not advised for hospitalized patients.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic created therapeutic challenges due to rapid spread and evolving scientific understanding.
- National and international health organizations continuously updated treatment guidelines, including Pakistan's National Command Operation Center (NCOC).
- Keeping clinical management guidelines current with emerging evidence presents significant global and local challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review pharmacological interventions for hospitalized COVID-19 patients based on NCOC guidelines v4.
- To compare these findings with current World Health Organization (WHO) treatment guidelines (v7.1).
- To identify methodological challenges in updating evidence-based treatment recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a systematic review of global research on pharmacological treatments for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
- Focused on interventions included in Pakistan's NCOC national guidelines v4 (December 2020).
- Assessed evidence strength and quality using GRADE methodology and compared findings with WHO COVID-19 pharmacological treatment guidelines v7.1.
Main Results:
- Strong evidence supports corticosteroid use in severe/critical COVID-19 patients, aligning with WHO v7.1.
- Conflicting evidence exists for tocilizumab; NCOC guidelines (v4) showed weak support, while WHO (v7.1) strongly recommends it for severe/critical cases.
- Both the systematic review and WHO v7.1 recommend against using antibiotics and ivermectin for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Conclusions:
- Evolving research on COVID-19 treatments necessitates continuous guideline updates.
- This study demonstrates challenges in maintaining up-to-date recommendations, with significant changes observed compared to WHO v7.1.
- Evidence assessment is crucial for adapting pharmacological treatment strategies during the pandemic.
Background:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented as a therapeutic challenge for clinicians worldwide due to its rapid spread along with evolving evidence and understanding of the disease. Internationally, recommendations to guide the management of COVID-19 have been created and updated continuously by the WHO and CDC, which have been locally adapted by different countries. Similarly, Pakistan's National Command Operation Center (NCOC), in its national COVID-19 management strategy, generated guidelines for national implementation. Keeping the guidelines updated has proved challenging globally and locally. Here, we present a summary of the process to assess the evidence, including a time-restricted systematic review based on NCOC Clinical Management Guidelines for COVID-19 Infections v4 published on 11th December 2020 version, correlating it with current recommendations and with input one of the guidelines authors, particularly noting the methodological challenges.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review synthesizing global research on treatment options for COVID-19 hospitalized patients, limiting it to pharmacological interventions for hospitalized COVID-19 patients included in Pakistan's NCOC's national guidelines v4 published on 11th December 2020. Each treatment recommendation's strength and quality of evidence was assessed based on the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology. These were then compared to the most current living WHO COVID-19 pharmacological treatment guidelines v7.1. One of the authors of the NCOC guidelines reviewed and commented on the findings as well.
Results:
We note that the data from our systematic review strongly supports corticosteroids use in treating severe and critically ill COVID-19 hospitalized patients correlating with WHO v7.1 guidelines 24 September 2021. However, evidence from our review and WHO v7.1 for the use of tocilizumab had some conflicting evidence, with data from our review until December 2020 supporting only a weak recommendation for its use, compared to the strong recommendation by the WHO for the use of tocilizumab in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 infection. Regarding the use of antibiotics and ivermectin use in treating COVID-19 hospitalized patients, data from our review and WHO v 7.1 recommend against their use.
Conclusion:
Research data about the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions to treat hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are rapidly evolving, and based on it, the evidence for or against recommendations changes accordingly. Our study illustrates the challenges of keeping up with the evidence; the recommendations were based on studies up till December 2021, and we have compared our recommendations with the WHO v7.1, which showed some significant changes in the use of pharmacological treatment options.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

