Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Ligand discrimination during virtual screening of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor crystal structures following
Jason S E Loo1, Abigail L Emtage2, Lahari Murali2
1School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University No. 1 Jalan Taylors 47500 Subang Jaya Selangor Malaysia JasonSiauEe.Loo@taylors.edu.my.
Abstract:
The therapeutic potential of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor remains underexploited with only a few synthetic ligands on the market. The crystal structures of both the inactive and active-state CB1 receptor have recently been solved, allowing for unprecedented opportunities in structure-based drug discovery applications such as virtual screening. In this study, we have investigated the virtual screening performance of the active and inactive-state CB1 crystal structures and their ability to discriminate between agonist and inverse agonist/antagonist ligands. The ligands of inactive and active-state CB1 receptor crystal structures were then swapped via cross-docking and the resulting structures were subjected to microsecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, followed by virtual screening of the MD-extracted structures. The original crystal structures were found to be biased towards ligands matching their activation state during virtual screening. MD simulations of the cross-docked CB1 structures resulted in a minor shift of receptor conformation towards the inactive state for the active-state CB1 structure complexed with the inverse agonist taranabant. Effects on virtual screening were more pronounced, as MD simulations of the cross-docked receptor-ligand complexes reversed the ligand bias in virtual screening observed with the original crystal structures. The simulations also produced receptor conformations that outperformed the crystal structures in virtual screening and in predicting the binding pose of the cognate ligand. The findings of this study highlight the potential of cross-docking and MD simulations to reverse the ligand bias of crystal structures, which may be useful when the crystal structure of only one activation state is available.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...

