Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2025

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
Published on: February 11, 2020
Bridging the Research Gap between Live Collections in Zoos and Preserved Collections in Natural History Museums
Sinlan Poo1, Steven M Whitfield2, Alexander Shepack3
1Memphis Zoological Society, Memphis, Tennessee, United States.
Abstract:
Zoos and natural history museums are both collections-based institutions with important missions in biodiversity research and education. Animals in zoos are a repository and living record of the world's biodiversity, whereas natural history museums are a permanent historical record of snapshots of biodiversity in time. Surprisingly, despite significant overlap in institutional missions, formal partnerships between these institution types are infrequent. Life history information, pedigrees, and medical records maintained at zoos should be seen as complementary to historical records of morphology, genetics, and distribution kept at museums. Through examining both institution types, we synthesize the benefits and challenges of cross-institutional exchanges and propose actions to increase the dialog between zoos and museums. With a growing recognition of the importance of collections to the advancement of scientific research and discovery, a transformational impact could be made with long-term investments in connecting the institutions that are caretakers of living and preserved animals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hybrid Zones
The Fossil Record
Microbial Classification System
Conservation of Small Populations
Habitat Fragmentation
What is a Species?

