Preliminary demonstration of a novel intraocular lens power calculation: the O formula
So Goto1, Naoyuki Maeda, Kazuhiko Ohnuma
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Goto, Maeda, Kawasaki, Koh, Nishida); Department of Ophthalmology, National Hospital Organization, Tokyo Medical Center, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Goto, Noda); School of Optometry, University of California Berkeley, California (Goto); Laboratorio de Lente Verde, Sodegaura, Chiba, Japan (Ohnuma); VO, Toda, Saitama, Japan (Lawu); Department of Vision Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Kawasaki); Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives (OTRI), Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan (Nishida).
Purpose:
To evaluate the performance of a new formula of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation (the O formula) based on ray tracing without commonly used parameters, including ultrasound-compatible axial length, keratometry readings, and A-constant.
Setting:
Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Design:
Retrospective consecutive case series.
Methods:
423 eyes (423 patients) implanted with a single-piece, L-loop, acrylic IOL were enrolled. All biometric data for the O formula were obtained by anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and SS-OCT-based biometer. The performance of the O formula was compared with those of the Barrett Universal II (BUII) and Kane formulas at 1 month postoperatively. Statistical analysis was applied according to a heteroscedastic test with SD of prediction errors as the main parameter for formula performance.
Results:
The SD of the O formula (0.426) was statistically significantly lower than that of the BUII formula (0.464, P = .034) but not statistically significantly different from that of the Kane formula (0.433, P = .601). The percentages of patients with refractive prediction errors within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of the O, BUII, and Kane formulas were 75.4% and 98.6%, 77.1% and 97.9%, and 76.6% and 98.1%, respectively.
Conclusions:
The O formula, based on ray tracing using SS-OCT-based devices, is one of the promising approaches for IOL power calculation, although additional larger scale studies are needed. It may be used as an alternative in IOL power calculation because of its independence from commonly used parameters.
