Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.3K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.3K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

141
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
141
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

2.4K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.4K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

63.1K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
63.1K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

13.2K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
13.2K
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

3.8K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLM-Based Extraction of Clinical Practice Guidelines into Structured Arguments.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Double-Decoder U-Net for Improved Segmentation of the Overlapping Trapezium Bone in X-ray Images.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Assessing the Concordance Between LLM-Based ICD-10 Coding and a Drug Database for Antihypertensive Drug Contraindications: A Weighted Inter-Rater Agreement Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Prospectively evaluating the environmental impacts of digital health applications: a case study and recommendations.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Adoption and Use of Social Media in Health Care Among Medical Residents: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR medical education·2026
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities in Postgraduate Digital Health Education.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

A GenAI Pipeline for Violinist Kinematic Data Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

AMAL-For-Qatar: A Comprehensive AI Ecosystem for Fetal Ultrasound Analysis - Project Overview and Achievements.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Treatment-Aware Multimodal AI for Dermatology: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Predicting Postpartum Depression Using Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Validation of Deep-Learning Models for Autosegmentation of Brain Metastases.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Delay-Dependent Gating in Modular RNNs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

596

A Qualitative Method for Learning Medical Expert Reasoning.

Karima Sedki1, Jean-Baptiste Lamy1, Rosy Tsopra2,3,4

  • 1Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, LIMICS, INSERM, UMR 1142, F-93000, Bobigny, France.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|June 8, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new qualitative method for learning antibiotic recommendation models. It captures expert reasoning to determine antibiotic features and ranking for optimal treatment selection.

Keywords:
CPGsExperts reasoningPreferences learning

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 20, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

596
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Antibiotic selection requires complex clinical reasoning.
  • Existing models may not fully capture expert decision-making processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a qualitative method for learning expert reasoning in antibiotic recommendation.
  • To develop a model that mimics expert strategies for antibiotic selection.

Main Methods:

  • Learning a model from expert reasoning and strategies.
  • Incorporating an integrity constraint for recommended antibiotic features.
  • Utilizing a preference formula for antibiotic recommendation ranking.

Main Results:

  • A learned model representing expert antibiotic recommendation strategies.
  • The model includes an integrity constraint defining essential antibiotic features.
  • A preference formula is established for ranking antibiotic recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively learns and represents expert reasoning for antibiotic recommendations.
  • The developed model provides a framework for feature-based integrity and preference-based ranking.
  • This approach can enhance the accuracy and reliability of antibiotic recommendation systems.