Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Assessing performance validity during attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations: Cross-validation of
Jenna E Ausloos-Lozano1, Hanaan Bing-Canar1, Humza Khan1
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Non-memory-based performance validity tests (PVTs) like the Trail Making Test (TMT) show promise for assessing adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), offering comparable accuracy to memory-based measures.
Area of Science:
- Neuropsychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Performance validity tests (PVTs) are crucial in neuropsychological evaluations.
- Existing memory-based PVTs may be less effective for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) assessment.
- Non-memory-based PVTs derived from processing speed and executive functions are needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To cross-validate non-memory-based PVTs (Verbal Fluency, Trail Making Test) against memory-based measures (Rey 15-Item Test) in adult ADHD evaluations.
- To determine the utility of Verbal Fluency (VF) and Trail Making Test (TMT) as embedded PVTs for adult ADHD.
- To compare the efficacy of Rey 15-Item Test (RFIT) Recall versus Recall/Recognition for adult ADHD evaluations.
Main Methods:
- A consecutive case series of 416 adults undergoing outpatient neuropsychological evaluation for ADHD.
- Four non-memory-based validity indices from VF and TMT were analyzed.
- Cross-validation was performed using Rey 15-Item Test (RFIT) Recall and Recall/Recognition as criterion measures.
- Validity classifications were based on failure rates across five independent criterion PVTs.
Main Results:
- TMT-A and TMT-B T-scores demonstrated acceptable classification accuracy (AUCs = .707-.723) with 29%-36% sensitivity and ≥89% specificity.
- RFIT Recall/Recognition showed similar sensitivity (42%) and specificity (90%) to TMT-B but with lower classification accuracy.
- VF and TMT embedded PVTs showed comparable sensitivity and specificity to other clinical populations, but required adjusted cut-scores.
Conclusions:
- Non-memory-based PVTs, specifically TMT measures, are valuable for assessing performance validity in adult ADHD.
- RFIT Recall/Recognition is a more effective PVT than standard RFIT Recall for adult ADHD evaluations.
- Adjusted cut-scores are necessary for optimal use of VF and TMT embedded PVTs in adult ADHD assessments.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020