Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
Published on: January 20, 2023
Multi-Objective Decision Method for Airport Landside Rapid Transit Network Design
Danwen Bao1, Shijia Tian1, Rui Li2
1Collage of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangsu No. 29 Yudao St, 211106 Nanjing, China.
This study optimizes airport transit networks by balancing passenger coverage, travel time, and cost. Star topology offers the best cost-efficiency, while finger topology maximizes coverage and time savings but at a higher expense.
Area of Science:
- Operations Research
- Transportation Engineering
- Urban Planning
Background:
- Large airports require efficient landside rapid transit networks.
- Current network designs often struggle to balance competing objectives like coverage, travel time, and cost.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a multi-objective model for designing airport landside rapid transit networks.
- To optimize passenger demand coverage, reduce travel time, and minimize operational costs simultaneously.
Main Methods:
- Formulation of an integer programming problem for network design.
- Application of a branch-and-cut algorithm to identify non-inferior solutions.
- Trade-off analysis using the modified Gini coefficient to assess efficiency, effectiveness, and equity.
Main Results:
- The star topology demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness for passenger demand coverage and travel time reduction.
- Finger topology achieved the highest passenger demand coverage and travel time reduction but incurred the highest costs.
- Maximizing passenger demand coverage led to higher efficiency and lower unit costs compared to minimizing travel time, which offered greater equity.
Conclusions:
- The proposed multi-objective model and algorithm effectively support airport transit network design.
- Network topology significantly impacts performance metrics; star topology is cost-efficient, while finger topology maximizes service but at a higher cost.
- Decision-makers can leverage this approach to balance competing objectives and improve airport landside transit service levels.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Manipulation and Analysis
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

