Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.5K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.5K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.4K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.4K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.4K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.1K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.1K
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Science-utility and science-trust associations and how they relate to knowledge about how science works.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Relevance versus big numbers: Students' criteria for selecting scholarly references online.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2018
Same journal

On the relationship between word reading ability and spelling ability.

Reading and writing·2025
Same journal

Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.

Reading and writing·2025
Same journal

Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text.

Reading and writing·2025
Same journal

Evaluating the structural and predictive validity of a derivational morphology task with struggling adult readers.

Reading and writing·2024
Same journal

Examining the Heterogeneous Early Literacy Profiles of First-Grade Students Who Are English Learners.

Reading and writing·2024
Same journal

Longitudinal Predictors of Word Reading for Children with Williams Syndrome.

Reading and writing·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K

Effects of context and discrepancy when reading multiple documents.

Cornelia Schoor1,2, Jean-François Rouet3, M Anne Britt4

  • 1University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

Reading and Writing
|July 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Readers" strategies for understanding conflicting information depend on the task context. A university setting influenced how students processed sources and presented information, highlighting context-dependent reading comprehension.

Keywords:
Beliefs about scienceConsistency of informationContextMultiple documentsReading behaviorReading comprehension

More Related Videos

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.9K
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

6.9K
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Reading Comprehension Research

Background:

  • Individuals frequently encounter discrepant information from various sources daily.
  • Readers construct understanding by linking content to sources and noting relationships (agreement/disagreement).
  • Prior research indicates source attention varies based on individual, text, and task factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if readers' strategies for handling discrepant information are influenced by task framing (university vs. personal context).
  • To examine if beliefs about science moderate context effects.
  • To test the assumption that reading strategies depend on information discrepancy and task context.

Main Methods:

  • 160 university students read social-scientific topics with consistent or discrepant information.
  • The reading task was framed within either a university or a personal context.
  • Participants wrote an overview essay after reading each topic.

Main Results:

  • The university context significantly impacted document model representations (e.g., text switches, use of adversative connectors).
  • Presentation standards also varied, evidenced by time spent on task pages and essay formality.
  • Beliefs about science did not emerge as a significant moderator of context effects.

Conclusions:

  • Reading comprehension is context-dependent, with reader behavior and outcomes shaped by contextual goals and standards.
  • The study supports a view where the framing of a task significantly influences how readers engage with and represent information.
  • Reader strategies are adaptable, responding to the specific demands and expectations of the reading environment.