Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
When A Nonnative Accent Lets You Spot All the Errors: Examining the Syntactic Interlanguage Benefit
Leah Gosselin1, Clara D Martin2,3, Ana González Martín4
1University of Ottawa.
Nonnative listeners may find accented speech easier to process, challenging the idea that accents are inherently difficult. This study provides electrophysiological evidence for an interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in both phonological and syntactic processing.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroscience of Language
- Second Language Acquisition
Background:
- Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic communication is common globally.
- Processing nonnative-accented speech is often challenging for native listeners.
- Limited research explores accented speech recognition from the nonnative listener's perspective, despite evidence of easier processing (interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the phonological and syntactic processing of nonnative-accented speech in nonnative listeners using electroencephalography (EEG).
- To examine if nonnative listeners exhibit the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.
- To compare nonnative listeners' processing of native and nonnative-accented speech, including typical and atypical grammatical errors.
Main Methods:
- EEG study with 30 English learners of Spanish.
- Participants listened to syntactically correct and incorrect Spanish sentences (gender and number errors) in native and nonnative-accented Spanish.
- Analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs), specifically phonological mismatch negativity (PMN) and P600, compared to a precursor study with native listeners.
Main Results:
- Nonnative listeners showed a phonological mismatch negativity (PMN) for native Spanish speech.
- A P600 was observed for all grammatical violations in nonnative listeners, indicating error repair regardless of error type or accent.
- Native and nonnative listeners displayed opposite PMN effects: natives showed larger PMN for accented speech, while nonnatives showed larger PMN for native speech.
- Nonnative listeners exhibited a syntactic P600 for all accented syntactic errors, unlike native listeners who only repaired atypical errors in accented speech.
Conclusions:
- Accented speech is not inherently difficult to process; nonnative listeners may benefit from nonnative accents.
- Electrophysiological evidence supports the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for both phonological and syntactic processing in nonnative listeners.
- Nonnative listeners demonstrate a broader sensitivity to syntactic errors when processing accented speech.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Language and Cognition
Components of Language
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

