Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
Published on: September 27, 2024
Pediatric Mandible Fractures: Mechanism, Pattern of Injury, Fracture Characteristics, and Management by Age
Megan V Morisada1, Travis T Tollefson1, Mena Said2
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Abstract:
Background: Development of the craniofacial skeleton and different mechanisms of injury warrant different treatment paradigms for younger children versus those at skeletal maturity. Objective: To characterize the mechanism, fracture patterns, and management of mandible fractures across the pediatric age spectrum. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review of <18-year-old children with mandible fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Characteristics were compared by age subgroup analysis. Results: Of 220 patients meeting inclusion criteria, motor vehicle collision (n = 53, 40.8%), falls (n = 48, 36.9%), and assault (n = 19, 14.6%) were the most common mechanisms with more falls in younger children and more injury by assault in teenagers. Condylar fractures were most common in the 0- to <9-year-old children (n = 27, 38.4%); angle/ramus fractures (56, 62.6%) were most common in 15- to <18-year-old children (p < 0.001). Nonsurgical management was associated with younger age (p < 0.001). Fourteen of 125 patients (8.0%) undergoing surgical intervention experienced complications. Being uninsured was associated with shorter median (interquartile range) follow-up of 5.6 (1.4-10.7) weeks, compared with private [11.9 (4.3-49.0) weeks] and public insurance [11.7 (3.7-218.0) weeks] (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The mechanism, fracture sites, and treatment differed by age with the youngest frequently managed nonoperatively and teenagers treated with adult algorithms. Complications were rare overall within 6-12 weeks after injury, with or without surgical management.
More Related Videos
06:59Fracture Apparatus Design and Protocol Optimization for Closed-stabilized Fractures in Rodents
Published on: August 14, 2018
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...