Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 4, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
People from the U.S. and China think about their personal and collective future differently
Will Deng1, Alexa K Rosenblatt1, Thomas Talhelm2
1Department of Psychology, Furman University, 3300 Poinsett Highway, Greenville, SC, 29613, USA.
Abstract:
We investigated how people think about their personal life and their country by testing how participants in the U.S. and China think about personal and collective events in the past and future. Using a fluency task, we replicated prior research in showing that participants in the U.S. had a positivity bias toward their personal future and a negativity bias toward their country's future. In contrast, participants in China did not display a positivity or negativity bias toward either their personal or collective future. This result suggests that the valence dissociation between personal and collective future thinking is not universal. Additionally, when people considered the past in addition to the future, they displayed similar valence patterns for both temporal periods, providing evidence that people think about the past and the future similarly. We suggest political and cultural differences (such as dialectical thought) as potential explanations for the differences between countries in future thinking and memory.
More Related Videos
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
06:04Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cultural Influences on Personality
Social Proof
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Surveys
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development