Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Policy Considerations for Routine Screening for Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs)
Riti Shimkhada1, Jacqueline Miller2, Elizabeth Magnan2
1From Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles (RS); Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (JM, JC); Department of Family and Community Medicine and Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis (EM); Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis (MM); California Health Benefits Review Program, University of California, Berkeley (GC). riti@ucla.edu.
California
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Public Health
- Trauma-Informed Care
Background:
- Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) screening is gaining policy attention due to increased stress and trauma.
- Disproportionate impact of ACEs on marginalized communities heightens urgency for policy action.
- Primary care providers are central to ACEs screening and trauma-informed care delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze California's SB 428, the ACEs Equity Act, mandating commercial insurance coverage for ACEs screening.
- To examine key debates surrounding ACEs screening effectiveness and potential harms.
- To estimate changes in ACEs screening utilization and expenditures resulting from the legislation.
Main Methods:
- Health policy analysis of California's SB 428.
- Review of ongoing debates among policymakers, clinicians, and researchers regarding ACEs screening.
- Estimation of potential shifts in screening utilization and healthcare expenditures.
Main Results:
- California's ACEs Equity Act expands screening coverage beyond Medicaid to commercial insurance.
- The legislation addresses growing concerns about childhood trauma and its health impacts.
- Anticipated increase in ACEs screening utilization and associated healthcare costs.
Conclusions:
- California's policy is a pioneering step in expanding ACEs screening coverage.
- Lessons from California's implementation can inform other states considering similar legislation.
- Ongoing evaluation is crucial to assess the impact and effectiveness of mandated ACEs screening.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

