Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 3, 2025

Advanced Self-Healing Asphalt Reinforced by Graphene Structures: An Atomistic Insight
Published on: May 31, 2022
Using Reclaimed Cement Concrete in Pavement Base Mixes with Foamed Bitumen Produced in Cold Recycling Technology
Justyna Stępień1, Krzysztof Maciejewski1
1Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, Aleja Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.
Reclaimed cement concrete in cold-recycled mixes showed slightly higher compressive strength, but the effect was not statistically significant. This suggests secondary cementation is limited in road base applications.
Area of Science:
- Civil Engineering
- Materials Science
- Sustainable Construction
Background:
- Reclaimed cement concrete (RCC) offers a sustainable alternative to natural aggregates in road construction.
- Potential secondary cementation from non-hydrated cement in RCC could impact long-term pavement performance.
- Cold recycling with foamed bitumen is an environmentally friendly pavement rehabilitation technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the use of RCC in cold-recycled mixes with foamed bitumen.
- To evaluate the time evolution of compressive strength in these mixes.
- To determine if secondary cementation occurs and affects material properties.
Main Methods:
- Preparation of two mixtures: a reference mix and a mix with 25% RCC.
- Testing uniaxial compressive strength at various curing periods (3, 4, 7, 14, and 28 days).
- Comparative analysis of strength development between the reference and RCC-containing mixtures.
Main Results:
- Mixtures with RCC exhibited marginally higher average uniaxial compressive strengths (11.5 kPa increase).
- Specific strength at 28 days: 498 kPa (reference) vs. 506 kPa (RCC).
- Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in compressive strength between the mixtures.
Conclusions:
- The incorporation of RCC into cold-recycled mixes with foamed bitumen did not lead to statistically significant increases in compressive strength.
- The limited effect is likely due to the time lag between demolition and reuse, and the presence of bitumen as a binder.
- Secondary cementation from RCC in this application appears minimal under typical conditions.
More Related Videos
11:14Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
05:38Production and Analysis of Sporosarcina pasteurii Biocement Bricks Using Custom 3D-Printed Molds for Unconfined Compression Tests
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cold Weather Concreting
To counteract the negative impacts of cold weather, ensuring...
Frost Resistant Concrete
Introducing microscopic air bubbles into the concrete mix through air entrainment creates small voids that accommodate ice expansion, thereby reducing internal pressures and preventing cracking. The optimal amount of...
Mass Concreting
To reduce the risk of such cracking, the concrete mix may incorporate low-heat cement and pozzolans to reduce the temperature rise. Pre-cooled angular aggregates and water-reducing admixtures...
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Accelerated Curing of Concrete