Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

319
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
319
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

232
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
232
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

292
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
292
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

1.9K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
1.9K
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

3.4K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
3.4K
Introduction to Learning01:18

Introduction to Learning

522
Learning is the process of acquiring knowledge or skills through practice or experience, leading to long-lasting behavioral changes. This acquisition occurs through interaction with the environment and requires practice or experience. For instance, mastering a skill such as surfing requires considerable practice and experience, highlighting the essential role of repeated interactions with the environment in learning.
In contrast to learned behaviors, unlearned behaviors such as crying, sexual...
522

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From human teams to hybrid intelligence teams: identifying, characterizing, and evaluating foundational quality attributes.

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems·2026
Same author

Normative uncertainty and societal preferences: the problem with evaluative standards.

Frontiers in neuroergonomics·2024
Same author

Exploring the effect of automation failure on the human's trustworthiness in human-agent teamwork.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2023
Same author

What values should an agent align with?: An empirical comparison of general and context-specific values.

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems·2022
Same author

Socio-Cognitive Engineering of a Robotic Partner for Child's Diabetes Self-Management.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2021
Same author

Volunteers in the Smart City: Comparison of Contribution Strategies on Human-Centered Measures.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2018
Same journal

Scale, trust, and the digital divide: a systematic review of AI and ML for agricultural applications.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Beyond uncertainty in modern active learning for trustworthy AI.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Eco-FinOps: a causal-agentic framework for energy-efficient and explainable cloud cost optimization.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Multimodal graph neural network with large language models for node and link prediction.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Efficient representation of boolean decision structures through Boolean function optimization.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Structural impact of non-IID heterogeneity on federated behavioral anomaly detection in IoT and IoMT systems.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

A Unifying Framework for Reinforcement Learning and Planning.

Thomas M Moerland1, Joost Broekens1, Aske Plaat1

  • 1Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS), Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
|July 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper introduces a unifying algorithmic framework for reinforcement learning and planning (FRAP) to solve Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). FRAP identifies common decision dimensions across both fields, aiding in algorithm design and insight.

Keywords:
frameworkmodel-based reinforcement learningoverviewplanningreinforcement learningsynthesis

More Related Videos

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 3, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments
09:43

A Fully Automated Rodent Conditioning Protocol for Sensorimotor Integration and Cognitive Control Experiments

Published on: April 15, 2014

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Operations Research

Background:

  • Sequential decision making is often formalized as Markov Decision Process (MDP) optimization.
  • Reinforcement learning (RL) and planning are two distinct yet successful approaches to MDP optimization.
  • These fields have largely developed independently, despite addressing the same core problem.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unifying algorithmic framework for reinforcement learning and planning (FRAP).
  • To identify underlying decision dimensions common to both MDP planning and learning algorithms.
  • To provide a basis for deeper insight into the algorithmic design space for MDPs.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a unifying algorithmic framework (FRAP) for RL and planning.
  • Identified key decision dimensions relevant to MDP optimization algorithms.
  • Compared existing planning, model-free RL, and model-based RL algorithms using the FRAP dimensions.

Main Results:

  • The FRAP framework successfully disentangles common factors in planning and learning approaches.
  • A comparative analysis of various algorithms along the identified dimensions is presented.
  • The framework offers a structured way to understand and design MDP optimization algorithms.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed FRAP framework provides a unified perspective on reinforcement learning and planning.
  • This unification facilitates deeper understanding and potential innovation in designing algorithms for sequential decision making.
  • The comparative analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches within the unified framework.