Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Functional tumor diameter measurement with molecular breast imaging: development and clinical application
Benjamin P Lopez1,2, Gaiane M Rauch3, Beatriz Adrada3
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
Abstract:
Purpose: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is used clinically to visualize the uptake of99mTc-sestamibi in breast cancers. Here, we use Monte Carlo simulations to develop a methodology to estimate tumor diameter in focal lesions and explore a semi-automatic implementation for clinical data.Methods: A validated Monte Carlo simulation of the GE Discovery NM 750b was used to simulate >75,000 unique spherical/ellipsoidal tumor, normal breast, and image acquisition conditions. Subsets of this data were used to 1) characterize the dependence of the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of a tumor profile on tumor, normal breast, and acquisition conditions, 2) develop a methodology to estimate tumor diameters, and 3) quantify the diameter accuracy in a broad range of clinical conditions. Finally, the methodology was implemented in patient images and compared to diameter estimates from physician contours on MBI, mammography, and ultrasound imaging.Results: Tumor profile FWHM was determined be linearly dependent on tumor diameter but independent of other factors such as tumor shape, uptake, and distance from the detector. A linear regression was used to calculate tumor diameter from the FWHM estimated from a background-corrected profile across a tumor extracted from a median-filtered single-detector MBI image, i.e., diameter = 1.2 mm + 1.2 × FWHM, for FWHM ≥ 13 mm. Across a variety of simulated clinical conditions, the mean error of the methodology was 0.2 mm (accuracy), with >50% of cases estimated within 1-pixel width of the truth (precision). In patient images, the semi-automatic methodology provided the longest diameter in 94% (60/64) of cases. The estimated true diameters, for oval lesions with homogeneous uptake, differed by ± 5 mm from physician measurements.Conclusion: This work demonstrates the feasibility of accurately quantifying tumor diameter in clinical MBI, and to our knowledge, is the first to explore its implementation and application in patient data.
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
08:32Using Computer-based Image Analysis to Improve Quantification of Lung Metastasis in the 4T1 Breast Cancer Model
Published on: October 2, 2020