Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
The impact of microsphere deposition algorithm complexity on microdosimetry following Yttrium-90 radioembolization
Courtney Henry1, Benjamin P Lopez1, S Cheenu Kappadath1
1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, TX, United States of America.
None:
The microsphere spatial distribution following Yttrium-90 radioembolization (90Y-RE) is inherently nonuniform, resulting in substantial microscopic dose heterogeneity not captured by conventional macroscopic dosimetry models. The motivation for this study was to build a robust framework to further understand the relationship between microdosimetry and macrodosimetry-based clinical outcomes. In this study, a stochastic microsphere deposition algorithm sampled histologically-derived cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) governing microsphere cluster diameter (Cdia), distance between clusters (Cdist), and cluster population (Cpop). Six unique models were generated to examine the impact of algorithm complexity on the corresponding absorbed dose distribution, ranging from a completely uniform to fully stochastic reference model. A two-sample statistical Kolmogorov-Smirnov test compared Cdia, Cdist, and Cpop derived separately from discrete and continuous CDFs. Microdosimetry calculations were performed by convolving a high-resolution dose-voxel kernel with each model. The mean absorbed dose Dmean and various dose-volume metrics (Dx,x=1,5,10,50,90,95,99) were calculated and compared to the reference model to assess the impact of algorithm complexity on dose metric error (Ex). Published median values of Cdia, Cdist, and Cpop agreed well with simulated counterparts. There were no statistically significant differences in sampling between discrete and continuous CDFs for Cdia (p=0.083), Cdist (p=0.104), and Cpop (p=0.094). Convolution with the90Y dose-voxel kernel resulted a -0.3% deviation compared to a single compartment dose estimate. Model comparisons suggest that sampling Cdist is critical for accurately modeling low-dose regions (E99=16%), while sampling Cpop is critical for resolving absorbed dose hot spots (E1=-12%). In contrast, sampling from Cdia had minimal impact on model accuracy. The results of this study provide the necessary framework to develop an improved understanding of the relationship between microdosimetry and macrodosimetry-based clinical outcomes following90Y-RE.
More Related Videos
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021