Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Antibiotics: it is all about timing, isn't it?
Michael Klompas1,2, Chanu Rhee1,2
1Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute.
Aggressive sepsis antibiotic timing may harm patients. Evidence suggests that rapid antibiotic administration doesn't improve outcomes and may lead to unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use in sepsis patients.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Health Policy
Background:
- Current sepsis guidelines and quality measures mandate rapid antibiotic administration for suspected sepsis or septic shock.
- The diagnostic uncertainty of sepsis upon initial presentation poses challenges to timely and appropriate treatment.
- Pressure for rapid antibiotic administration may lead to unnecessary or inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure in some patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the association between time-to-antibiotics and mortality in sepsis.
- To assess the impact of current sepsis quality measures, such as the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services SEP-1 measure, on patient outcomes.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for antibiotic timing in sepsis management.
Main Methods:
- Review of observational studies examining the relationship between antibiotic delay and sepsis mortality.
- Analysis of data from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services SEP-1 measure.
- Critical assessment of methodological limitations in existing studies, including adjustment for comorbidities, illness severity, and antibiotic use in uninfected patients.
Main Results:
- Many observational studies linking delayed antibiotics to increased sepsis mortality lack adequate adjustment for confounding factors.
- When properly accounted for, the association between time-to-antibiotics and mortality is weakened or eliminated, particularly in patients without septic shock.
- Analysis of the SEP-1 measure indicates increased sepsis diagnoses and broad-spectrum antibiotic use without demonstrable improvement in patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians should tailor antibiotic urgency based on diagnostic certainty and patient severity.
- Immediate antibiotics are crucial for patients with septic shock or high suspicion of infection.
- In less severe cases with uncertain infection diagnosis, withholding antibiotics for further investigation is a safe and appropriate strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Chronopharmacokinetics: Circadian Rhythms and Influence on Drug Response
The time of drug administration is an important factor to consider, as it can influence the toxic dose of a drug. For example, a study conducted by Prins et al. in 1997 examined the effects of the timing of...
Antibiotic Selection
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...

