Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Growth outcome at 2 years using Fenton and Intergrowth-21st charts in infants less than 1500 g
Lara González García1, Enrique García López2, Belén Fernández Colomer2
1Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Vital Álvarez-Buylla, Mieres, Asturias, Spain.
Insights
Neonatal weight z-scores from Fenton and Intergrowth-21st charts effectively predict short stature and malnutrition in very low birth weight infants at two years. Both charts showed similar predictive accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Growth Monitoring
- Public Health
Background:
- Consensus is lacking on optimal neonatal growth charts for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
- Accurate growth assessment is crucial for VLBW infants' long-term health outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive accuracy of Fenton 2013 and Intergrowth-21st (IW-21) charts for VLBW infant somatometry at two years.
- To identify risk factors associated with short stature in VLBW children at two years.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 513 VLBW infants (born 2002-2017, mean gestational age 30.05 weeks) was analyzed.
- Neonatal z-scores (Fenton and IW-21) were assessed for predicting short stature, head circumference deficits, and malnutrition at two years using WHO charts.
Main Results:
- Both Fenton and IW-21 charts demonstrated utility in predicting short stature and malnutrition risk at two years, with comparable Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.
- Discharge weight z-score was a significant predictor for short stature, malnutrition, and head circumference deficits at two years.
- Prevalence rates at two years were: short stature (17.2%), head circumference <-2 DS (4.1%), and malnutrition (6.1%). Independent risk factors for short stature included low weight for gestational age and longer hospital stay.
Conclusions:
- Discharge weight z-score serves as a reliable predictor for adverse growth outcomes (short stature, malnutrition, head circumference deficits) at two years in VLBW children.
- No significant statistical difference was observed in the predictive performance between the Fenton and IW-21 neonatal growth charts.
Introduction:
There is no consensus on which neonatal chart is best to use in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. The aim of the study was to compare the Fenton 2013 and Intergrowth-21st (IW-21) charts based on their predictive ability for somatometry at 2 years, as well as to analyze factors related to short stature at 2 years.
Material And Methods:
Cohort of children with VLBW born between 2002 and 2017. Association between neonatal somatometry (z-score by Fenton and IW-21) and risk of short stature (<-2 DS), head circumference <-2 DS and malnutrition at 2 years (BMI < -2 DS) was analyzed (WHO charts).
Results:
513 children with a mean gestational age of 30.05 ± 2.5 weeks were included. Birth and discharge weight z-score by Fenton and IW-21 were useful for predicting risk of short stature and malnutrition at 2 years (without differences in the AUC of the ROC curves). Weight z-score at discharge was also useful for predicting head circumference < -2 DS. At 2 years, prevalence of short stature, head circumference < -2 DS, and malnutrition was 17.2, 4.1, and 6.1%, respectively. Low weight for gestational age and length of stay were identified as independent risk factors for short stature at 2 years.
Conclusions:
Discharge weight z-score is useful for predicting risk of short stature, malnutrition and head circumference < -2 DS at 2 years in very low birth weight children, with no statistical difference between using Fenton or IW-21 charts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Nature and Nurture
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
Bacterial Growth Curve
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue

