Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

712
Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
712
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

41.2K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
41.2K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

45.8K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
45.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ocular speech tracking persists in blindness, but its dynamics and oculo-cerebral connectivity depend on visual status.

eNeuro·2026
Same author

Correction: Digital wellbeing experience in the workplace: development and validation of the Work-Related Human Computer Interaction Questionnaire.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Will I speak louder if I see you struggling to understand? Speech modifications in response to non-verbal visual cues of listening effort.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Digital wellbeing experience in the workplace: development and validation of the Work-Related Human Computer Interaction Questionnaire.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Spatial Distance and Temporal Attentional Focus Modulate Voluntary Action Preparation and Awareness.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Metacognition for Listening in Noise: The Role of Age and Hearing Loss.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Preface.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same journal

Foreword.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same journal

Fundus autofluorescence imaging.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same journal

The electroretinogram as a means to study the physiology of the retina.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same journal

Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
Same journal

Modeling the human retina in a dish: Advances and future directions.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.1K

Neuroplasticity following cochlear implants.

Francesco Pavani1, Davide Bottari2

  • 1Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.

Handbook of Clinical Neurology
|August 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implants (CIs) help sensorineural hearing loss by directly stimulating the auditory nerve. Research explores how the auditory cortex adapts to CI electrical signals, aiming to improve user outcomes.

Keywords:
Auditory cortexCochlear implantsDeafnessSensitive periodsSpeech

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig
09:56

Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig

Published on: June 15, 2018

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 1, 2025

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.1K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig
09:56

Cochlear Implantation in the Guinea Pig

Published on: June 15, 2018

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory system research
  • Medical device efficacy

Background:

  • Sensorineural hearing loss impacts the auditory cortex.
  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are neural prostheses for hearing loss.
  • Variability in CI outcomes necessitates neuroscientific investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review literature on auditory cortex functional changes in response to CIs.
  • To examine basic electrical hearing responses, tonotopy, and binaural cue processing.
  • To consider speech-evoked responses in human CI users.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of animal models and human studies on CI effects.
  • Analysis of auditory cortex responses to electrical stimulation.
  • Examination of tonotopy, binaural processing, and speech-evoked potentials.

Main Results:

  • Auditory cortex exhibits altered functional properties with CI use.
  • Tonotopy and binaural processing can be affected by electrical stimulation.
  • Speech-evoked responses in humans provide insights into CI processing.

Conclusions:

  • Neuroscientific findings offer potential to enhance CI clinical practices.
  • Understanding auditory cortex adaptation can help reduce outcome variability.
  • Further research can bridge the gap between CI technology and user experience.