Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

100
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
100
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

679
In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...
679
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

481
Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...
481
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving01:12

Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving

788
Pappus and Guldinus's theorems are powerful mathematical principles that are used for finding the surface area and volume of composite shapes. For example, consider a cylindrical storage tank with a conical top. Finding the surface area or volume can be challenging for such complex shapes. These theorems are particularly useful in calculating the volume and surface area of such systems. Here, the cylindrical storage tank with a conical top can be broken down into two simple shapes: a...
788
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

4.3K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.3K
Principle of Moments: Problem Solving01:30

Principle of Moments: Problem Solving

917
The principle of moments is a fundamental concept in physics and engineering. It refers to the balancing of forces and moments around a point or axis, also known as the pivot. This principle is used in many real-life scenarios, including construction, sports, and daily activities like opening doors and pushing objects.
One such scenario involves a pole placed in a three-dimensional system with a cable attached. When a tension is applied to the cable, the moment about the z-axis passing through...
917

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Learning and fine-tuning a generic value-selection heuristic inside a constraint programming solver.

Constraints : an international journal·2025
Same journal

Perception-based constraint solving for sudoku images.

Constraints : an international journal·2024
Same journal

Computing relaxations for the three-dimensional stable matching problem with cyclic preferences.

Constraints : an international journal·2023
Same journal

A collection of Constraint Programming models for the three-dimensional stable matching problem with cyclic preferences.

Constraints : an international journal·2022
Same journal

"Almost-stable" matchings in the Hospitals / Residents problem with Couples.

Constraints : an international journal·2020
Same journal

Evaluating the impact of AND/OR search on 0-1 integer linear programming.

Constraints : an international journal·2010
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Fast And Parallel Decomposition Of Constraint Satisfaction Problems.
  1. Home
  3. Fast And Parallel Decomposition Of Constraint Satisfaction Problems.

Related Experiment Video

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K

Fast and parallel decomposition of constraint satisfaction problems.

Georg Gottlob1, Cem Okulmus2, Reinhard Pichler2

  • 1University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Constraints : an International Journal
|August 15, 2022

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed faster algorithms and parallelization techniques to compute Generalized Hypertree Decompositions (GHDs) for complex Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). This enables efficient computation of optimal GHDs for a wider range of problems.

Keywords:
Constraint satisfactionHypergraphsParallel computingStructural decomposition methods

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

6.7K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Complexity

Background:

  • Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) are computationally challenging.
  • Decomposition methods are crucial for solving complex CSPs.
  • Computing optimal decompositions like Generalized Hypertree Decompositions (GHDs) has been algorithmically limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present algorithmic improvements and parallelization techniques for faster GHD computation.
  • To enhance the ability to compute optimal GHDs for a broader range of CSP instances.
  • To provide a foundation for CSPs and related problems using structural properties.

Main Methods:

  • Algorithmic enhancements for GHD computation.
  • Development of parallelization techniques.
  • Focus on computing minimal-width GHDs.

Main Results:

  • Significantly faster computation of Generalized Hypertree Decompositions (GHDs).
  • Enables computation of optimal GHDs for a wider array of CSP instances.
  • Improved performance on modern computing architectures.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods advance the practical computation of GHDs.
  • Facilitates the evaluation of CSPs and related problems (e.g., Conjunctive Query answering) via structural analysis.
  • Opens new possibilities for applying GHDs in AI and database systems.