Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 1, 2025

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.4K
What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in
Louisa Flander1, Evelien Dekker2, Berit Andersen3,4
1Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, 85084The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
|August 15, 2022
Summary
Australian colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation remains low. Comparing international programs revealed that within-program intervention trials, not just kit type, can increase screening uptake.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in Australia, with high incidence and mortality rates.
- Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Program faces low participation, with only 44% of mailed kits returned in 2018-2019.
- Identifying effective strategies to improve CRC screening participation is a public health priority.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify successful practices and features of international bowel cancer screening programs with higher participation rates.
- To inform potential interventions for optimizing CRC screening participation in Australia.
- To understand factors influencing participant and practitioner engagement in screening programs.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature search for national CRC screening programs with over 50% participation using postal iFOBT kits.
- Included programs with free return of home kits.
- Performed interviews with cancer registry staff and academic researchers on screening engagement.
Main Results:
- National programs in the Netherlands, Scotland, Denmark, and Finland reported over 50% screening participation.
- These countries share characteristics such as smaller populations, high literacy, one-sample iFOBT kits, national registration systems, and use of randomized trials in program research.
- No single solution was identified for Australia's low uptake, apart from the potential benefit of a one-sample kit.
Conclusions:
- International comparisons suggest that implementing within-program intervention trials is a promising strategy to increase Australian screening participation.
- Randomized trials within screening programs hold potential for improving CRC screening uptake.
- Optimizing screening participation requires a multifaceted approach, including research and program-level interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
1.1K
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
1.1K
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
467
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
467

